CaffeineHigh Posted August 8, 2023 Share Posted August 8, 2023 -1 on reverting the update, because even with the reduction, I have barely had to refuel my vehicles. I could still go to the moon and back without even breaking a sweat or having to fuel. Link to comment
Diamond Posted August 8, 2023 Share Posted August 8, 2023 I don't think that's a good idea. If I remember correctly, it takes about 8 miles to travel from Paleto Bay to Los Santos International Airport (Might be a little less), so I think this update is good considering the size of the map and how much people actually drive. -1 from me because I could already go days without fueling my vehicle. I don't need that to get turned into weeks. Link to comment
gunman Posted August 8, 2023 Share Posted August 8, 2023 -1, the map isn't up to scale with a city in real life so the fuel consumption needed to be tweaked to fit the actual distance traveled. Takes like 5-10 minutes to get from Northern Los Santos to Sandy Shores using main roads. Link to comment
Late Posted August 9, 2023 Author Share Posted August 9, 2023 (edited) You're all delusional but I respect your freedom to -1. The fuel was fine before we started messing with it. The OLD OLD system was okay too, /every/ car had a 200 mile radius. Then we added fancy fuel economy and different fuel types which worked well (but not all vehicles were realistic) and then we just THREW IT ALL AWAY.... now nothing makes sense. Edited August 9, 2023 by Late Link to comment
Developer 808Masterus Posted August 9, 2023 Developer Share Posted August 9, 2023 Some vehicles have really 'weird' fuel consumption, I agree. I'll try to tweak it for next update slightly, fix some unrealistic cars fuel consumption due to some placeholders or other stuff. The fuel economy will NOT be reverted to previous state, but it will be 'fixed', at least a bit. 3 Link to comment
Recommended Posts