roleplayer

ngl pedo rp is virtual text too but whatever It's banter, none cares.

r u a pedo bro anyway i guess most people arent bothered by it so staff can L&A this and move on

yeah i kinda dont chill out when im being reminded of pedophiles because someone decided to add a very special portrait (and perhaps the only one) to the furniture system

The movie script describes the intercourse between a 12 years old and a grown adult. It's not a "father/daughter coming of age dynamic" scene, it's textbook paedophilia. Saying that most people just see what's in front of them is like saying "sure there's child porn, but look at the editing".

I'm not gonna quote nor link the script, but there's an explicit scene that falls under the paedophilia criteria that never made it into the movie for that reason. The movie is sickening, it's disturbing and I'd love to have that object completely wiped from the furniture system under the basis of the Offensive Roleplay rules (I reported the thread so it gets moved to the Suggestions forum).

lmao bro maybe u watched it with ur eyes closed cause theres literally a 12yo trying to fuck a grown ass man hell naaaa if you dont know how much pedos love this movie im afraid u live under a fucking rock or something idk and there's no pedo cult, im referring to cult movies......

Though I'm confident whoever added the portrait as an object knew exactly what they were doing, especially considering there aren't many similar objects anyway. I don't think someone randomly picks a portrait and due to an unfortunate set of circumstances it depicts pedophiles' favorite movie.

I'm not trying to get anyone labelled, I'm sure there're people who haven't seen the movie and know nothing about it. This thread is aimed at those who do know what that portrait is about, and whether they also get uncomfortable about it.

I've edited the main post again, as I've seen some confusion in the general chat as well as this thread. ^ this guy knows what I'm talking about. To me, that portrait is a huge pedo flag and the fact it exists as a furniture object is extremely weird.

I've edited the main post to reference it as a portrait. If you haven't seen the movie you don't know how fucked up it is, and the fact this portrait is in every erper interior makes me wonder why it's an object in the first place.

Due to the nature of the movie, the explicit script involving a minor (underage Natalie Portman), and it being a cult widely acclaimed by pedophiles, I've always found weird that this object exists in the first place. There're thousands of characters we could have portraits of, yet I keep seeing this specific one, and I've always thought of it as a dog whistle for pedophiles, as that's what the movie is mostly known for. It weirds me out, I'm wondering if anyone feels the same about it.

I think I've seen five different threads from you on "how to roleplay x" in the last month, are you sure you like the concepts you're playing or are you just forcing yourself to like them?

Username: lstourist Comment: this map is fucking unreadable use a bigger rez

Some casinos have internal policies to handle large amounts of money through checks and wire transfers after a threshold is met, both for the patron's safety and because of tax documentation/anti-money laundering regulations. Having the winnings deposited to your bank account should be a thing, as well as being able to withdraw from ATMs inside the casino.

Why do you play 3 characters at the same time?