Degu

Breaking News: San Andreas Supreme Court Strikes Down Death Penalty! Written by Gabriel Stone, 15/04/24 Above: Associate Justice Harold Steinbach In a landmark decision, Associate Justice Harold Steinbach of the Supreme Court has modified Sam Poehling's original sentence of capital punishment set in place by Judge Scherer during his initial trial. Poehling is a Jewish man and claimed to have been in danger from Morrow while incarcerated. He was already serving a life sentence based on prior convictions for white-collar crimes when he murdered Charles Morrow by repeatedly stabbing him in plain view of other inmates and CCTV within the prison. The petition to the appellate court was put forward by Ambrose Napier, Raymond Scarpati, and Jack Blackhawk who sought to stop the death warrant in its tracks on behalf of their client, Mr. Poehling, who's fate has been a topic of considerable controversy. Following Poehling's initial trial which concluded on the 27th of March with a sentence of capital punishment. Shortly after the verdict, on the 29th of March, Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade signed the death warrant which scheduled Poehling's execution by lethal gas for the 5th of April, barely a week after the ruling by Judge Jennifer Scherer. Blackwell mentioned in an official statement that "The rush for this execution could be construed as stemming from the evil desire of using the death of a human for political reasons, showcasing the reinstatement of the death penalty in 2023, in the State of San Andreas" Associate Justice Steinbach ruled today, on the 15th of April, In favor of Defendant-Appellant Sam Poehling and reduced his sentence from capital punishment to imprisonment for murder of the second degree under Pen, Code §203. Steinbach alleged that the trial court had "reached its verdict improperly" and had not adequately demonstrated with evidence that premeditation had taken place. "I could not disagree more on the basis of this evidence proving premeditation." stated Steinbach, further explaining that "the mere intent to kill is not the equivalent of a premeditated intent to kill." Steinbach further stated that the Supreme Court had found "significant prejudicial error in the trial court's determination of Poehling's premeditation" stating that the trial court itself had inferred the premeditation without supporting evidence. He stated that the trial court had falsely determined that the use of a makeshift blade by Poehling indicated that he had also spent time crafting the blade, deliberating, reflecting, and reasoning over the act of murdering Charles Morrow. Steinback stated "The trial court improperly used the defendant's prior convictions for white-collar crimes as aggravating factor to hand down a death sentence." and further quoted most notably Arave v. Creech, 507 U.S. 463, 474 (1993) in saying ""If . . . an aggravating circumstance applies to every defendant eligible for the death penalty, the circumstance is constitutionally infirm" Both Steinback and Blackwell appeared to raise questions as to the competency of Judge Scherer within the Superior Court, as well as raising questions as to the true implications of the State Defense and Deterrence of Terrorism Act. Blackwell elaborated on his own thoughts in an exclusive interview with Los Santos Insider. Interviews I was able to interview Sam Poehling at the prison alongside his lawyers Ambrose Napier and Raymond Scarpati shortly after his initial verdict. I later interviewed Chief Public Defender Laurent Blackwell. Unfortunately at this time, I've been unsuccessful in receiving a response from Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade for his perspective, though I look forward to a follow-up interview with Judge Scherer. Interview with Sam Poehling, Ambrose Napier and Raymond Scarpati Conducted on the 31st of March 2024 Above: Scarpati, Poehling and Napier standing side by side inside the State Prison. Stone: Alright, thank you for taking the time to speak to me today Sam. I attended your sentencing just a couple of days ago. How have you been since then? Poehling: I've been OK. It's obviously a lot to handle, y'know— given I've been proven guilty of a crime and given this Nation's ultimate verdict— death. But, I've taken it with a grain of salt. I'm doing fine. Stone: So as you're aware, you're the first to receive this verdict since the reinstatement of the penalty. What I'm here to do today is to let your voice be heard, as I do for anyone from any walk of life. What you tell me today is entirely down to you, but I hope you'll be happy to speak with me. I'll begin. I'd like to start with a bit of background if that's alright, Sam. Would you tell me a bit about yourself? Such as your life before prison, hobbies, interests, schooling. That sort of thing. Poehling: I played soccer. I went to school— University of Phoenix. Uh, I majored in Accounting. Diploma's hanging up in my bedroom still, heh-heh.. But uh, y'know— nothing remarkable. Grew up really Jewish. Still am Jewish. Had to tone it down a notch given my environment, but it's gotten a bit better. Capmany over there has me a room all to myself. Isn't that just sweet of him? Napier: In an environment like this, it's Mr. Poehling's faith that keeps him in good spirits. Poehling: It's all I have in the confines of these cold, dark walls. Stone: Did you work as an accountant after university then? Poehling: I did, it was for a small accounting firm here in Los Santos, actually. The money was alright. I did it because it was easy. Stone: I see... well I'd like to move on to discussing you time here within the prison. I have to ask, what has it been like for you as a Jewish man within the prison system? What was it like when you first arrived, even? Poehling: I didn't publicize it. I knew better than to let the animals in here know who I truly was. Obviously my appearance was sort of a giveaway, but some people looked past it. I got called Jonah Hill on the mainline. Weird Al. Think of a Jewish celebrity with curly hair. I got called that. Stone: Were any of them aware prior to Morrow's death? Poehling: Absolutely not. There were people who definitely had underlying suspicions, but nobody knew— "Hey, that guy's a Jew!" I doubt anyone really even knew about me being Jewish until my appearance in court. I had a big photo taken of me, front-and-center, with a Star of David around my neck. Stone: So I'd like to ask you, would you be willing to take me through what really happened the day of the incident? Napier: I would advise my client to not answer that question. Poehling: I won't be talking about the events that transpired. Stone: Right moving on then. May I ask why you killed Charles Morrow? Would you at least be willing to discuss that with me? Scarpati: I would advise Mr. Poehling to not answer that question. Poehling: Sorry, what was that? Stone: Why did you kill him? Poehling: I wouldn't really like to talk about that. Stone: I can see that none of the questions I have are going to be answered tonight. Poehling: Why's that? Stone: I'm not going to continue further with the interview. I am looking to provide you a last chance to tell your story.. should your appeals fail and you've nothing left to lose, please do reconsider talking to me. It's up to you if you wish to or not. Poehling: Well, continue asking questions. If you're just going to ask different variants of "What happened the day he died," or "Why'd you kill Charles Morrow," then I really think you need to come up with something of real substance to ask me. Ask me if I'm afraid of dying. Ask me if I'm terrified of walking to a gas chamber to die. Stone: If the only questions I ask are sympathetic ones it's not incredibly unbiased is it, Sam? Let me list some of the questions I had hoped to ask. What were you feeling during the incident? Specifically while killing Morrow..... Why did you do it the way you did? why such a spectacle?.... Would you personally agree with the judge saying that your actions were pre-meditated? How did you feel when you heard your sentence? Are you afraid of what's to come? Poehling: I'll answer to the latter. Stone: Very well. Poehling: When Judge Scherer, err.. correct me if I'm wrong on the pronounciation, when she stated that I would be granted the death penalty, I was hit with a wave that I could only describe as uh...helplessness. That my life, y'know.. that I've lived for about thirty years now, was in the hands of a corrupt government entity that acts only on it's own accord and basis. I was certainly afraid of what was to come. Stone: Can you explain to me why you feel the ruling was corrupt? Poehling: I was asked, 'how are you gonna go?' People are more concerned with how I was going to choose to have my life ended than my true feelings at hand. I am terrified. Do you know what happens when you're sentenced to death via. the gas chamber, Mr. Stone? Stone: I'm somewhat familiar with it. Yes. Poehling: I read about this, I looked it up— they put me in an air-tight chamber with a bucket of sulfuric acid beneath me. They activate a mechanism that drops potassium cyanide into the acid and it makes lethal hydrogen cyanide gas. They strap me to a chair, Gabriel. And they gas me. My lungs fill with fluid, and I choke to death. Stone: Did you have any opinions on capital punishment prior to all this? Just out of curiosity I suppose. Poehling: I've never really had any thoughts on it. It has it's purpose. If the government's vision of 'rehabilitation' is death, then so be it. I shall be rehabilitated at the hands of the Government of San Andreas. Stone: What do you think should be done with you instead of capital punishment? What would rehabilitate you, you think? Poehling: Men like me act out of brashness. If you were in my shoes, being cornered by a man with a bald head saying — "If I had my way, I would be sawing your k*** head off," how would you act? Would you curl up in a ball and subject yourself to persecution at the hands of a white supremacist? I certainly wouldn't. And I didn't. Stone: I see, tell me a bit about Morrow's treatment of you on the inside then. Was that a regular occurrence? Poehling: Charles was a pig. Everyone in there called him Misfit. I mean, the guy was a societal outcast in there serving a sentence for something far worse than I did. Stone: Was he disliked by everyone on the inside? Poehling: I don't know. I was afraid of him. He would constantly bump into me when we were heading into the showers saying that I'd be lucky to leave this prison alive. Stone: I do have a question about that. You said he called you a k***... correct? Poehling: Jeez louise, Gabriel. Pump the brakes. I prefer the term 'the k-word.' Stone: Yes but my point is, you claimed a few minutes ago no one knew. Morrow knew? Poehling: He called me many things. He called me a hook-nosed Jew, a penny-pinching k***, he was very vulgar. Morrow was one of the few that had a definitive suspicion about me. Napier: Mr. Poehling claimed that people had suspicions, Mr. Stone. Don't try to skew Mr. Poheling's perspective. Stone: Don't try to insinuate I'm doing something I'm not, Napier. Thank you. I'm trying to understand if Morrow himself knew. Poehling: Charles was very condescending towards me, Gabriel. He would never outright call me those things at the table in front of the rest of the guys, because not everyone thought the same thing he did. People would look at him differently if he did. Stone: What was your relationship like with the rest of the white prisoners, other than Morrow? Poehling: Neutral. I never picked a side with anyone. I certainly didn't 'follow orders' from some higher power with a bald head. I was in there to do my time, not bake bread. Speaking of bread, Ambrose— your uh, your wife— she made that good sourdough and you brought it, can you get her to make some more? And try and bring it next time? Napier: Of course, Sam. Stone: Why don't you tell me about how you landed in prison in the first place, Sam? Poehling: White-collar stuff, really. It was for uh.. mail fraud, bank fraud, wire fraud— all of it was entirely financial. I uh.. y'know, I regret what I did there too. Taking advantage of this country's flawed systems, I uh.. yeah. It's all public record anyways. Stone: I understand that. And tell me a bit about how you became a lifer, in your own words. Poehling: Uh, lifer— yeah. The judge gave me consecutive twenty year sentences. So it wasn't really 'life', per-say, but it basically was. I was eligible for parole. Stone: Hm. Poehling: I just had to serve a fraction of my total sentences on good behavior, and they'd just whisk me back out into society. No more prison food. No more ordering Kosher. Heh.. Stone: Question for the lawyers then... either of you. Does that mean anything legally for the final verdict Poehling received on the basis of being a "lifer" already? Sounds like a bit of a grey area. Napier: The Judge did refer to his status as a "lifer" being a factor in her ruling. Stone: Mhm. Napier: However, with Mr. Poehling's good record, up until that moment, I don't agree that it should have played a factor in the ruling for the death penalty. He was on a good track to getting his parole, and was proved to be serving his time well. You don't see Mr. Poehling sitting here with swastikas on his body, you don't see his head shaved. He clearly did not fall in with the bands of violence that are found within this prison. Stone: I see and I assume there's going to be an appeal in regards to this? I assume so from the switch in legal representation anyway. Scarpati: We, on behalf of Mr. Poehling, do plan to seek a remedy to this conviction. We're currently looking into the steps we need to take in order to begin this appeal process. Stone: I see. And Sam, last couple of questions. Prior to the incident with Morrow, had you ever been involved in notable violent altercations? Poehling: No. Stone: Mm.. I think that's all I have to ask for today. But we might revisit this, if you agree to of course. Interview with Chief Public Defender Laurent Blackwell Stone: Mr. Blackwell can you state your position and name for the microphone please? Blackwell: I'm the appointed Chief Public Defender for the County of Los Santos. Stone: Lovely, so lets begin. Blackwell: And well, name, you already said it. Stone: Mr. Blackwell... How are you feeling about Associate Justice Steinbach's recent ruling on the Poehling case? Blackwell: Well, the opinion by the Supreme Court of the State of San Andreas, delivered by Justice Steinbach is among the best we've ever had. As opposed to the terrible job Judge Scherer from the Superior Court did... but hey, I guess that explains why Steinbach is in the Supreme Court, and Scherer has remained in the lowest court for — God knows how long. Stone: It seems you're not the only one to feel that way about Scherer's ruling on Poehling, a similar sentiment seemed to echo in Steinbach's final statement before his ruling. Is this the only time you've disagreed with Judge Scherer's decision? Blackwell: I'll be honest with you. Scherer is the worst of the worst, I don't know how that woman became a Judge, I don't know who keeps making the mistake of allowing her to remain one. Let's not forget, this is the same Judge who, in the Lafayettes' case, called South LS people "undeveloped individuals". And now apparently she went for Poehling, a poor jew man who defended himself from antisemitism in prison. So, at this point, I wonder if a pattern of behavior is to be established from Scherer's words and decisions. Above: The signed death warrant from Lt. Governor Noah Wade Stone: I see, very strong words in regards to Scherer. You also made comment on Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade's speedy signing of the death warrant, can you expand at all on your opinion? Blackwell: Do you know what the average time in death row is in our country? Stone: Please, enlighten me. Blackwell: Twenty two years, data from 2019. 22 years is the average time between sentencing and execution. And Wade tried to push it in 8 days. Stone: Why do you think that is? Blackwell: Because he wanted to put the death penalty to work. The Republicans had been seething for a long time since the death penalty was banished from San Andreas. Last year, they managed to bring it back, with the State Defense and Deterrence of Terrorism Act. They claimed that the capital punishment was going to be reserved for terrorists, serial killers ... but since our State, a State of good people, doesn't have those? They just tried to rush it on the very first chance they got, for a Jewish inmate who had no other choice but to defend himself, given the poor job by the Department of Corrections, who also rushed to publish a statement about how the first execution was about to happen. You should really look into the Department of Corrections, by the way. Ask them how many riots they've had in the last 6 months. The next question will be "Wow, why so many?". Stone: You keep mentioning that he's Jewish, do you believe there's antisemitism at work here then, Mr. Blackwell? Blackwell: Oh, I mention it because the man Poehling had to kill had a track record of antisemitism, which Scherer conveniently disregarded. Stone: I see, so if you could confirm something for me. Like you said, The State Defense and Deterrence of Terrorism Act ... as far as my understanding was, was specifically for use against terrorists and serial killers. So how then is it now being used for cases such as Poehling's? Blackwell: So, that law made four different charges eligible for capital punishment. Treason, Espionage, Domestic Terrorism, and some specific cases of Capital Murder. In this case, it was a type of Capital Murder, which is when someone who is already serving a life sentence, kills another through premeditated actions with malice aforethought. I am not quite sure how a matter regarding inmates and prison security has anything to do with "State Defense and Deterrence of Terrorism", but they did that. Stone: Do you believe it then to be a misuse of the act? Blackwell: Yeah, absolutely. I assume the intention behind making inmates eligible for death penalty was to put a deterrent in place against Correctional Officer killings and so on. But, we can see how easy laws are misused. Instead of investing in better facilities, equipment for COs and an improvement of conditions in prisons? They kill the inmates. By the way, do you know how they intended to kill Poehling? Stone: I do... and I can certainly see why it could be problematic. I spoke to Poehling in prison, he stated to me that he was to be killed by use of lethal gas. Blackwell: Yes, they were about to put a jew who killed an antisemitic inmate that threatened his life in a gas chamber. Stone: I understand. What are your thoughts on Poehling's actions, if I might ask your opinion? I assume you've seen the footage as many of us have. Blackwell: I think Poehling did what he had to do, given the lack of protection from the competent authority. Charles Morrow was an inmate serving a Capital Murder punishment, a violent inmate. Charles Morrow murdered Austin Fischer in the San Andreas State Prison earlier this year. Poehling could have been next if he had not defended himself. Stone: Do you believe that the death penalty has a place in our society or are you fully against it? Blackwell: It is not our right to take a life. I am aware there is evil in our society, I am aware there are monsters. But we have the tools, the means, to lock them away for good. There is no need to resort to capital punishment. Martin Luther King Junior said that Capital Punishment is against the best judgement of modern criminology, and above all, against the highest expression of love in the nature of God. And I couldn't agree more. When we take the life of another, especially as an organized scheme, every single person who stands by it, who tolerates it? Loses a bit of humanity. An evil deed is not redeemed by an evil retaliation. And it's not only that. We have incompetent people everywhere, judges, politicians. Are we really giving them the right to decide who lives and dies? If it was up to Lieutenant Governor Wade, Poehling would be rotting underground or burnt to ashes after having gone through the gas chamber. It was only the appeal before the Supreme Court that stopped that from happening. And, one last detail? When the Supreme Court grants a writ of certiorari, meaning the will review the case? They allow the prosecution to submit a brief, it's called an amicus curiae, where they explain their reasoning for the charges and proposed sentence. The prosecution didn't bother responding to that. That's how much they cared about having pushed for the death sentence of a man. Stone: I see, Thank you...that is all I have to ask for this interview Mr. Blackwell, do you have any parting words for the public, Judge Scherer or perhaps Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade before we conclude? Blackwell: You are not God. You are not perfect. You are not even above average. Stop trying to play with life and death, there will be a day of reckoning for all of you, and you will have to respond for these evil things you are doing. Stone: Thank you, Mr. Blackwell. Blackwell: Thank you. Sources: Los Santos Insider | Landmark Verdict: Poehling Becomes First to Face Death Penalty in San Andreas Since Its Reinstatement Sam Poehling Court Records Charles Morrow et al. Court Records [24SCWC00002] Sam Poehling v. People of The State of San Andreas The Flaws of Capital Punishment - Statement following SCOSA decision Comments Are: Enabled Username: Comment:

DELETED Written by Gabriel Stone, 02/04/24 ARTICLE DELETED Comments Are: Disabled Username: Comment:

Hostage Situation Unravels as Alleged Victim Turns Out to be Accomplice Written by Gabriel Stone, 04/04/24 Above: Sergeant Cody Wojcik 31st March 2024 — In a surprising turn of events, what was initially reported as a hostage situation revealed itself to be a poorly executed money-making scheme that resulted in the deaths of two men and the arrest of another. The incident took place around at the Paleto Motel where the three individuals had barricaded themselves inside a room before making demands of a ransom via a call to emergency services. Sergeant Cody Wojcik was on scene to recount the incident, stating that around 15:53 a 911 call had come in from a man by the name of Edward Otos who claimed he was being held hostage and that the takers were demanding a sum of one hundred thousand dollars ransom. The Sheriff's Department Special Weapons Team responded to the scene and called in LSPD Metropolitan Division's assistance. Upon arrival, LSPD Metro took charge of the scenario, with SWAT Lieutenant Darnell Walker holding tactical command over the scene. Officer Christopher Decker attempted negotiations with the alleged hostage takers who were verbally aggressive with him, claiming that they would "dismember the hostage" should they not receive their ransom. According to Wojcik, Walker prepped an emergency breach by the door consisting of SWAT operators before calling the bluff of the hostage takers inside. Left: SWAT begins their breach. Right: Otos brought out to be arrested. After breaching the property, both hostage takers were taken out swiftly by SWAT. One male had a pistol in his possession, while another had a kitchen knife. The male with a kitchen knife attempted to attack one of the SWAT officers before being shot dead. Upon his rescue, Edward Otos was revealed to have been working in conjunction with the hostage-takers as part of a money-making scheme and ultimately got his accomplices killed. He was swiftly arrested and taken into the custody of the State Prison. The trio's disorganized scheme is considered to be a solo act and performed in relation to any form of organized crime or gang activity. Comments Are: Enabled Username: Comment:

Exclusive Interview: The Informant That Took On Russian Organized Crime Tells All Written by Gabriel Stone, 31/03/24 Following the major Russian Organized Crime bust carried out by SEB in the early hours, the informant who fed details about the group to law enforcement following the murder of a PHMC nurse reached out to Los Santos Insider for an exclusive interview. I was privileged enough to speak to the self-proclaimed 'dead person walking' this afternoon in an interview where they revealed the intricacies of the work they've been carried out and their motivations for doing so. Stone: It’s great to have you here. So you are an informant for law enforcement, is that correct? Informant: That is correct. Stone: And a little background, of course nothing too revealing today, but how did you end up an informant? Informant: It all started as I had to watch my friend get murdered in front of my very own eyes by a former lover of mine. I swore that day that I would get him revenge in the future. A man with a lot of power in the city, one of very few who work in the shadows, a lot of corrupt individuals. Stone: I see, so you offered your services up and have been informing ever since? Have you been doing it a long time now? Informant: For a very short time I'm afraid. I offered my services up when I discovered the planned assassination hit that was placed on a PHMC Nurse, a mother. I couldn't stand by it, I had to act. Stone: Do you know anything about why that hit was placed? If I may ask? Informant: From my very trusted source, god bless that person for he hasn't seemed to reached out to me since that day— she knew too much, these words are coming from the direct source. Stone: So she was being killed in order to clean up loose ends, is that what you're saying? Informant: Indeed, and from what I was told? She was threatening to contact law enforcement herself on them. When I heard that? I knew I had to be the one making the final call. A few days after that and she was already gone, I contacted the law enforcement just as I heard about her passing. Stone: And was it you that pointed law enforcement to the thirteen properties that were raided last night? What role did you play in that? Informant: I had been gathering information for perhaps a month or two in advance prior to the raids that happened last night. I contacted law enforcement, I gave them numbers, names, businesses— everything that I knew of. All to get revenge on my old friend who no longer walk on this earth. Stone: Did you assist in the placing of bugs and other devices inside the relevant properties or was that entirely law enforcement's doing? Informant: I had no part in the placing of the bugs, I only informed them or what was going on and who killed who, who worked under who— it is a /big/ network they all work under. Stone: Would you be willing to give me some insight into the structure of this network? Informant: So, all of these individuals work under the 'Main Table'. A lot of these individuals own night clubs, strip clubs— casinos, a lot of these businesses are used for money laundering. I know a lot of these businesses, who owns what— some of these businesses are used for secret meetings too. And, I know a certain lawyer who has his hands in this filth too. Stone: I see, I of course won't ask you to name any names unless you decide to do so. Were you ever privy to these secret meetings? Informant: I was privy of one of these meetings, though it was rare that I had the chance to actually witness a lot of what was going on behind closed doors— but a lot of people trusted me with their secrets. And their secrets? I told law enforcement everything I knew and whatever they told me. I won't tell who this lawyer is, but I can confirm that he accepted one hundred thousand dollars in cash to help the Russian Mob. Stone: Quite a sum. How forthcoming were they with their secrets? Were they very quick to trust you, or did it take time? To me it sounds like you've accomplished this in quite a short window of time. Informant: They seemed to trust me with their secrets after some time had passed by. Not right from the start, but it took time. Stone: Did you have to do anything to earn this trust? Informant: I was put on some missions beforehand in regards to another group before I had earned their trust completely. A lot of intel to gather, names, etcetera. Stone: Did you have to take part in illegal activities during your time as an informant? Informant: No, most of my work was done through legal means. I'd just like to tell people one thing, if you don't want your name or your picture found on Social Media? Better to not use Social Media at all. Stone: And why do you say that? I feel there's a specific story there. Informant: A lot of these people I have found through Social Media only. I don't think they realize they messed up a lot by posting their pictures online. Stone: Understandable, even I've used it that way as a journalist. It makes one's job a lot easier. Have there been times you were afraid for your life? Has anyone suspected you? Informant: I have always been afraid that I will get caught, but they never seemed to see what I was doing. I believe that they might suspect me now, if so? This will be the very last time I am ever heard of alive, and I most certainly know who will have ordered a hit on my head. But I have decided, I have accepted my fate. I am not afraid of death anymore, some would call me crazy but now...? I somewhat wait for it around the corner. Stone: I understand. I won't ask anything regarding those you might leave behind, for obvious reasons. Is there anything you'd like to say to them, should this be the last time you speak on record? Or to anyone for that matter. Informant: If I live for a bit longer, I most certainly will be re-appearing on Los Santos Insider for another interview. I live for the thrill anyway. And for those I leave behind? I'd just like to say that I am getting revenge for [Redacted]. Stone: Is it safe for you to mention the name here? Informant: Most likely not, people will already have figured out who I am. I am not afraid of them though, they can come and try to catch me. They certainly are listening to this interview as we speak. I turned my life around, and I wish that more individuals turn their life around too. Law enforcement can help you out of this shitty situation you're in. Stone: In that case, I suppose there are a few questions I'd like to ask that I was avoiding... I know this one may be difficult for you, so I understand if you'd like to turn the question down. What happened to [Redacted]? Informant: [Redacted] was murdered in Chumash after causing a scene that didn't please people. He had to go. I sat in the same car as the murderer— and [Redacted] too. Stone: Causing a scene? can you elaborate on that at all? Informant: I can't say exactly which club it was but— he caused us a huge brawl in one of the clubs one of my previous friends owned. One, two— it was a lot of brawls happening in a very short amount of time. There was no way around it. Stone: I see, and this was enough reason to have him killed. You're certain this was why? Informant: From what I understood, this was the reason he had to go. Unless there were things they didn't tell me. Stone: Did you ever see the narcotics and illegal weapons they were dealing in first hand? or watch any deals take place? Informant: I saw narcotics— illegal firearms— a few deals take place, that is correct. Automatic firearms, these people are no joke. They are dangerous. Stone: Did you ever watch a hit being carried out? Informant: I did. Stone: Can you tell me a bit about that? How it felt, what it was like from start to finish? I'd genuinely be very interested in some insight into how that goes down. Informant: I witnessed one hit in Hawick, you know this gym that is located there? Around that parking lot— it was awful, I felt like my stomach was being turned upside down. I couldn't bear to watch it. I still have nightmares about it. Stone: Sorry to dig up trauma of course. Was that using automatic firearms? was it over quickly? Informant: I can't remember exactly— I think one of them might have used an automatic firearm. It was over within a few seconds. Stone: Are there those within the crime group that you are personally attached to? friends? Perhaps good people doing terrible things? Informant: I am not sure if I could call them friends anymore. Some people I still have love for, but— this man that I loved? He can not leave this life that he chose, but I wish he could so we could go back together. But that isn't an option so...There is probably only one person I am attached to still that is a part of that crime group. Stone: Do you believe they'd ever leave? Informant: Unfortunately, no. These organizations? Once you enter them, you are in for life. There is no way out of it. Stone: I understand. Were you witness to their methods of recruitment, at all? How do they bring in new blood? Informant: Unfortunately, I wasn't. Stone: I understand. And we're drawing to the end of our interview here shortly... you mentioned businesses involved in organized crime. Would you care to name any or would you rather leave them unmentioned? Informant: I can't say any names but— they are all across the city. From Vespucci to Vinewood, to uh— they are everywhere practically. Stone: I see, and are these connected to different Russian groups that work together? Because I know law enforcement specifically mentioned Vespucci Russian Organized Crime. Informant: They are, there are different Russian groups that work together one way or another. It is like a spider web of connections and networks. Stone: I see. Is there anything more you wanted to discuss before we bring this to conclusion? Informant: Not that I can come to think of, no. Stone: Any final parting words you'd like to say? Informant: Hmm— I advise anyone trying to get out of a criminal lifestyle to reach out to Law Enforcement. They will help you, they will keep you safe. That would be all. Stone: Thank you for coming to speak to me today. Informant: Thank you for bringing me here and to let me share my story, and thank you for listening to Los Santos Insider. Are you a member of organized crime affected by this operation? Reach out to 15151 or email [email protected] ((Degu on the forums)) if you'd like to provide an anonymous interview or point of view regarding the operation/informant. No wires, no faces, no names. Comments Are: Enabled Username: Comment:

Los Santos Sheriffs Department Strikes Major Blow Against Russian Organized Crime in Vespucci Bust Written by Gabriel Stone, 31/03/24 31st March 2024 – In the early hours of the morning, The Los Santos Sheriff's Department, namely SEB, dealt a significant blow to Russian organized crime in Vespucci following a meticulously coordinated operation that culminated in a series of arrests and the seizure of illegal narcotics and firearms. The operation combined the strengths of various divisions, including the Special Enforcement Detail (SADCR), Canine Services Detail, Emergency Services Detail, Detective Division, and the Department of Corrections. Special thanks were given to members of OSS, SAT, and NCCIT. The collaborative effort proved instrumental in wrapping up the operation in less than three hours. The operation was a culmination of two months of hard work by the department sparked initially by the murder of a PHMC nurse and the informant that had brought the actions of the criminals to their attention. The operation involved the long-term use of numerous wiretaps and bugs placed in the properties and cellular devices of the responsible parties in order to capture conversations regarding illegal activity. In the space of only two hours, thirteen search warrants were executed under the guidance of SEB leadership figures, team leaders, and canines. In total the department seized 2 kilograms of various narcotics including cocaine, crack cocaine, heroin, PCP, and other illicit narcotics alongside 20 illegal firearms including submachine guns and automatic rifles. The bureau hinted at a possible upcoming press conference regarding the successful operation soon, but no time has been set yet. The bust represents a significant victory for LSSD and all those involved and has removed a significant number of narcotics and firearms from the streets. Are you a member of organized crime affected by this operation? Reach out to 15151 or email [email protected] ((Degu on the forums)) if you'd like to provide an anonymous interview or point of view regarding the operation. No wires, no faces, no names. Comments Are: Enabled Username: Comment:

Landmark Verdict: Poehling Becomes First to Face Death Penalty in San Andreas Since Its Reinstatement Written by Gabriel Stone, 30/03/24 Above: Poehling arriving at the Greg E. Joplin Courtroom. 27th March 2024 - Sam Poehling's trial has been ongoing since the 11th of February of this year. However today the case finally came to a head as Poehling was proclaimed guilty of capital murder, thus becoming the first man to face the death penalty since the SDDT Act of 2023 was brought into force. The act, passed in September of last year, repealed the initial abolition of the Death Penalty. The act remains the center of considerable controversy. At the time of its passing, the former Republican Party Chairman Jonathan Spencer, caused public uproar when he implied that the death penalty should be used on the LGBTQ+ community before later resigning from his post. The sentencing proceedings attracted a significant law enforcement presence, including the LSSD and LSPD, due to security concerns. Despite a bomb threat, which turned out to be a hoax, the proceedings concluded without incident. Poehling was allowed to speak prior to sentencing and used his time to apologize to those affected by his actions by saying "I would like to apologize to those affected by my actions, directly and indirectly" During the evening, he visibly flinched during recounts of his actions and was noticeably sweating coming up to final sentencing. He was already serving a life sentence when he murdered Charles Morrow, a man also serving a life sentence for the capital murder of Austin Fischer in prison. The execution of Morrow is laid out in CCTV footage gruesomely recounted in court. The account states as follows; on February 5th at 21:42, Sam Poehling was seen nervously exiting cell 344 where Charles Morrow was before entering another inmate's cell. He spent time in this cell before exiting alone and assembling on the tier with a group of White Pride-affiliated inmates (named to be: Dennis Parker, Jackson Webb, Wyatt Reeves and Travis Kober) where he was seen to be 'visibly shaken'. After speaking with the group of white males, Poehling then returned to cell 344 and proceeded to drag Morrow from inside, down the tier to the middle of the unit. In front of multiple witnesses and cameras, Poehling executed Morrow by stabbing him repeatedly in the neck and body using a makeshift blade. Poehling went compliantly to SHU, meanwhile, Morrow was pronounced dead on scene. Above: Poehling hears his sentence. Judge Jennifer Scherer delivered the sentence in court after deeming the case to meet all five required criteria for the death penalty; incarceration, serving a life sentence, causing the death of another human being, through premeditated actions, with malice aforethought. Scherer honed in on the topics of 'premeditation' and 'intent to kill' and stated that Poehling had had multiple opportunities to reconsider his actions but had continued with them regardless, especially noting the time taken to craft a makeshift weapon. Judge Scherer stated as follows "At no point throughout this process did he stop at all: not when he was crafting a blade, not when he took him and took the time to bring him out the tier in front of everyone, not when he stabbed him once, and twice, and thrice, and consequent times, and not at any point. The defense claims that he "could have" taken the makeshift blade from another cell, that "he could have" quarrelled before, yet all these are unlikely suspicions, unbased and unfundamented, that differ from the circumstantiality required of the evidence as per U.S. v. Thomas." Due to Poehling's status of life imprisonment, the Judge deemed that the only reasonable action was to order capital punishment, stating that he was "not suitable for society or any kind of social inclusion, given the heinous act committed". While fighting the case prior to the final sentencing, Poehling's lawyer, Mr. Blackhawk, called upon Charles Morrow's own trial in which he spoke aggressively toward his prosecutor "I do not give a s*** about your attorneys, judge, I'm representing myself, and this f****** prosecutor better watch his f****** lip since he's lying, my court case? It was ongoing when the situation occurred, which I have no idea about. Respectfully? F*** that prosecutor, I'll bash his brains out if he keeps f****** slanderin' me." He was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to life in prison. His verdict was delivered on the 20th of January but the full case concluded on the 4th of February. Morrow's murder occurred just a day later. Mr. Blackhawk further suggested that Poehling's actions may have been motivated by fear, as he is a Jewish man surrounded by white supremacists in a prison setting. Blackhawk stated "Mr. Morrow’s conduct towards other inmates, especially those of Jewish ancestry, like Mr. Poehling and the deceased Mr. Fischer, should be taken into consideration as my client’s alleged acts may have been motivated by fear of Mr. Morrow and his associates’s reputation for heinous group attacks against single victims." Blackhawk went on to mention that murder of this nature is nothing unusual in the prison system. "Every single day at the State Penitentiary is a trial for his life" he stated, claiming that men are often driven to the brink of desperation by the environment within the prison, and for this reason, Poehling should not be found guilty of Capital Murder "for lack of this offense's elements as defined by the Penal Code" Above: Charles Morrow as seen in his PenPal video. Blackhawk further questioned why corrections officers were pushing for the death penalty, and why The People were following suit so readily, questioning further yet why Poehling should be used as an example when others guilty of similar or worse have received lighter sentencing. Delving deeper into the original evidence provided by written account and CCTV, Blackhawk honed in on Poehling's demeanor on the day of the murder. "Visibly shaken" he questioned what exactly was meant by this statement, and whether anyone knew exactly what had happened to Mr. Poehling, disregarding claims that his visible state could be used as evidence for premeditation "Does his conversing with other inmates hint at careful planning to take the life of another human being? That’s another no" Blackhawk concluded his lengthy statement by denouncing the notion of capital punishment as a result of Poehling's actions, stating that the Justice System cannot deprive a man of life when there are no signs of premeditation. Poehling will now remain in the custody of the San Andreas Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation until his death sentence is enacted, in a manner prescribed by law. The case has reignited debates surrounding the death penalty, with opinions divided on its effectiveness and morality. Some argue that state-sanctioned executions are akin to the crimes committed by the perpetrators, while others contend that certain individuals pose too great a risk to society to remain alive. The Poehling case is likely to fuel further discussions on this contentious issue. Sources: Sam Poehling Court Records Charles Morrow et al. Court Records Comments Are: Enabled Username: Comment:

24/MAR/2024 | PD Graduation Ceremony | LSPD Academy | Photos Gabriel Stone retains the right to all photos. You may reach out via email to purchase the license to use the photos but be aware that purchase does not equate to individual ownership over the images.

24/MAR/2024 | Male Reaches For Gun at Davis LTD | Davis LTD | Photos & Video Gabriel Stone retains the right to all photos. You may reach out via email to purchase the license to use the photos but be aware that purchase does not equate to individual ownership over the images. Photos

13/MAR/2024 | Blood Drive | ULSA | Photos Gabriel Stone retains the right to all photos. You may purchase the license to use the photos but be aware that purchase does not equate to individual ownership over the images.

Username: Stalker Comment: You know I don't get into accidents as often as people think considering the line of work! but yes, you're probably thinking of me.

CONTENT WARNING: This video contains footage of violent acts. ((The shorts would be available on Youtube, They're new content and not derivative of the full length season episodes)) Previous Shorts: Stringer Hospitalized By Head On Crash! CLICK HERE FOR: STRINGERS: SA - Season 1 - Full Length Episodes Comments Are: Enabled Name: Comment:

CONTENT WARNING: This video contains footage of a severe car crash. ((The shorts would be available on Youtube, They're new content and not derivative of the full length season episodes)) CLICK HERE FOR: STRINGERS: SA - Season 1 - Full Length Episodes Comments Are: Enabled Name: Comment:

This'd make things a lot cleaner, +1

The Unexpected Call

The Paint Job & The Fuckup The Next Day...

White Mountain Lion Causes a Stir Around Chiliad: Here's What You Should Know Written by Gabriel Stone, 11/02/24 Above: Ranger Vandroy and Sergeant White by a tree thought to be scratched by the white mountain lion. Some months ago during an arson incident in the Chiliad wilderness area, a white mountain lion was spotted. Since then the animal hasn't been sighted until recently, we interviewed Sergeant White and Ranger Vandroy regarding the animal. Two sightings have been reported in the same area, the first being on the 5th of February during a Sacred Heart Foundation-organized hike. The kids spotted the animal during the hike at which point it fled further into the woods, rangers attempted to track the creature but were initially unsuccessful. On the eighth just a few days later it was sighted by a privately organized hiking group in the Cassidy and Raton area. The mountain lion jumped from a tree along the trail and roared at frightened attendees before running away. What's unique about this lion is that it's an adult with very pale coloration, described by Ranger Vandroy as "...easily distinguishable from your regular deer or coyote at a distance, almost white in color." What Chiliad Visitors Need to Know When asked if there would be any danger to visitors of the Chiliad area, Sergeant White responded "Whenever hiking, I'd say to stay as vigilant as you would be on any other hike. We're just visitors here, in wildlife's home." while reiterating that Mountain Lions are a normal part of Chiliad's fauna. Ranger Vandroy further added that visitors should not attempt to interact with the animal as it is "big and capable of causing harm, more so than a coyote would" but also added that "so long as visitors stick to the trails and take proper precautions, it should be safe" SASP advises visitors to act as they would during any other visit and to respect nature. However they provided advice as to what to do should any visitors come face to face witht he mountain lion itself. Vandroy said "First and foremost try to keep calm. Don't panic— Easier said than done when you're face to face with one, but that's the number. Secondly, do your best to keep your awareness of where it is, and back away from it. Preferably get inside a vehicle. And by no means try to approach it." Sergeant White further added "Make yourself big. Stand your ground, don't face away from it or crouch down." "The animal will consider you a trespasser into its territory; it wants you out of it, so doing just that will help with your situation." Added Vandroy and stated that as soon as any who encounter the animal are clear of the threat they should report sightings immediately to San Andreas Park Rangers on their landline: 808. The Long-Term Plan Parks hope to locate the animal and safely relocate it deeper into the mountains where it will be at less risk to causing harm to others, but importantly at less risk of being harmed itself by trophy hunters or curious visitors. "Once located we'll take the proper measures along with our team of veterinarians to sedate it and release it back deeper into the wilderness of Chiliad" Vandroy explained. A Warning Note For Hunters As with any unique animal, especially predators such as mountain lions, there's the risk of trophy hunting. Parks were very quick to reiterate that this activity is illegal. White said "Don't. The Wildlife and Conservation Act strictly prohibits doing that. If you do, and we find out, you will be convicted. Every hunter that we run into gets checked for licenses, and their vehicle may get checked as well" she reminded all hunters hoping to set out to make sure they're up to date with the WACA and classification of the wildlife in the area. Parks stated that they're making an active effort to be on the lookout for any hunters and are actively informing those whom they find in the Chiliad wilderness region, they've even put up posters informing visitors at entrances to trails. There will be increased checks performed on hunters until the animal is relocated. Authors Note Some time after the interview I was placing down LSI camera traps around the area, although naturally this carried a risk. I moved down from where scratch marks had been found on a tree and followed some tracks in wet mud to what appeared to be an empty den containing a pile of carcasses. After moving to safety and alerting parks they investigated the area. I've been extremely curious about the white puma since its first appearance last year, it seems SASP may be getting closer to safely capturing and relocating the animal. I will continue to investigate the story, hopefully the coming days yield some camera trap footage. If You See Anything Relating To This Story - Call SASP On 808 Comments Are: Enabled Username: Comment:

Till We Meet Again (Content Warning: Suicide Ideation & Severe Trauma) And now we're up to date...

Blood On Our Hands (Content Warning: Gore, Severe Trauma)

The Tipping Point

Finding A Place

This is the life of Isaac "Monty" Montanelli Feel free to post any roleplay you've had with Monty. I'm a little behind on doing this so I will be backtracking some story as gracefully as possible. This post will contain mature themes such as gore and suicide ideation etc. Read at your own risk. Backstory Where it all started... Thus begins Monty's character thread.

Inspiring Foster Kids: The Future Pilots Team Takes to the Sky Comments Are: Enabled Name: Comment:

Interview: Meet The Democratic Party City Council Candidates Written by Gabriel Stone 30/01/24 While the GOP were keen to present their candidates for city council at the kick-off event last Tuesday, the public have yet to hear the voices of their Democrat opposition. I was able to meet with both Sophie Wu, who is aiming for the Western District as well as Olivia Zhao who is aiming for election in the Central District. Unfortunately, David Wu, aiming for election in the Northern District, was unavailable for an interview at the time. Sophie Wu's opposition in the Western District is Daniel Park, an independent candidate, while her husband David Wu is facing a Republican candidate in the battle for the Northern District. Zhao, however, faced with Republican candidate Garrett Baker for the Central District. Stone: So Mrs. Wu you've been an active member of the community in the Western District for some time. Last I caught up with you was shortly after Operation Long Reach and your arrest. I know at the time you had dreams of running for Senate. Why is it you've put yourself forwards for the position of councilwoman? Wu: Well I think going for the Senate may have taken me out of the community and I came to realize, I'm still needed here. So city council would be the best opportunity. I can help the district in a more hands on manner. Stone: And why is it you feel that you specifically are a suitable candidate for the position? What are you hoping to bring to the district, should you be elected? Wu: Well... I'm well known in the area, most of the locals know me or know of me. I've always been a voice for their concerns throughout the years. I think— I know, I can bring real change to this community, make it flourish and thrive. It always has but they need a loud voice. Fortunately, I'm very loud. Stone: What do you feel separates you from the Republican candidates? Wu: I don't feel that Republican interests suit the area and the people living here. Infact, I'd go as far to say that their interests actively work against the locals of the Western district. It needs care and love, fairness and equality for all citizens. Stone: What is it you feel the Western district needs more specifically and why? I'm thinking back on past events. Wu: Protection against police brutality and profiling, would be my main concern. You witnessed it first hand a while ago. We also need criminal reformation and rehabilitation. There's nothing here to prevent people falling back into crime, low job opportunities and poor housing. Stone: Thank you Mrs. Wu. Are there any closing words you'd like to say? Wu: Hm...Let us start a new chapter in history, a new Western district, for the better. Stone: Thank you, Mrs. Wu... Stone: Miss Zhao, it's nice to have you here tonight. Zhao: Thank you so much for being here, Gabriel. I wouldn't miss it. Stone: Miss Zhao you're running for the Central District, I've got to start us off by asking... why the Central District? Zhao: Well, Gabe— I grew up there. Right near Mission Row. I have a deep connection to the neighbourhood, a place I've called home. This place is close to me but has also had its fair share of challenges. Economic disparities are evident. I've seen first-hand how issues like limited access... To education, affordable housing, and adequate housing impact our residents. The neighbourhoods diversity, while also our strength, also brings complexities when it comes to these issues. And frankly, I haven't ever seen anyone in the area taking care of our large community. I want to be that change. Stone: And if you were elected councilwoman of the district, these are the issues you'd be aiming to improve? Zhao: Yes, exactly. I am a candidate deeply committed to creating a fair and forward-thinking society. I want to help make a difference for those who are under-privileged and haven't been able to receive the support they deserve. Stone: And what would you say separates you from your Republican opposition? Zhao: I really emphasize tackling social inequalities, racial justice, and poverty through government intervention and support. However, I also believe my stances blend the traditional party lines. I believe in realism. We need government intervention, however— People deserve to keep their liberties, as well. I believe in a multifaceted approach that— We faced a small interruption by a homeless man that Mrs. Wu offered food at the Night Market. Zhao: Anyways, in the realm of social welfare, I believe in the value of social safety nets. But I also emphasize the importance of efficient resource allocation. I believe we can support our constituents while also making our city prosperous. I think one of the key critiques of many democrats are the dreams they inhabit. I want to take those dreams and make them a reality. We can be fiscally responsible and also empathetic at once. Stone: Thank you Miss Zhao, and lastly in closing what would you like to say to the voters of the central district? Zhao: Central District— I understand the issues that matter most to you— From ensuring access to the supports you need, promoting fair and equal justice. I am not here as a partisan; I am here as your advocate. For too long… We've been left on our own. Together we can create a district that is fair, prosperous, and sustainable. A place where all of our voices are heard, and our well-beings are prioritized. Thank you for considering me as your representative. Olivia Zhao for Central District! Stone: Thank you, Miss Zhao. Zhao: Thank you so much, Gabriel. Comments Are: ENABLED Username: Comment:

28/JAN/2024 | Jamestown Injunction | Jamestown | Photos $5000 (LSSD may use free, but please credit Gabriel Stone. Feel free to donate regardless.) To buy usage rights for the photos: (( /transfer 5000 010043224 <Company Name> - 28/JAN/2024 )) Gabriel Stone retains the right to all photos. You may purchase the license to use the photos but be aware that purchase does not equate to individual ownership over the images.

GOP Present Their Candidates as City Council Campaigns Begin Written by Gabriel Stone, 26/01/24 On the 23rd of January 2024, The GOP held a "Kick-off Tuesday" event in which they presented their candidates for the City Council Elections. The campaigning period begins now, featuring a mixture of Republican, Democratic and Independent candidates. The kick-off event was proudly introduced by Mayor Preston who claimed to be fulfilling one of his "greatest promises" by reinstating "...the City Council after its long absence". He continued on to say that San Andreas "is a RED State" and always would be, insisting that Republicans have the people's best interests at heart Northern District Josély Martinez (R) - David Wu (D) Western District Sophie Wu (D) - Daniel Park. (IN) Central District Garrett Baker (R) - Olivia Zhao (D) Southern District Eduardo Vargas (IN) - Frank Buntz (R) Los Santos County District Ted Cook (R) - Colton Reed (IN) ELECTION SCHEDULE CAMPAIGNS RUN FROM JAN 23rd - FEB 8th The first candidate introduced was Josély Martinez, running for the Northern District. Martinez introduced herself as an active member of the Northern District's community, promising that she'd be putting efforts into making the city "...a better, safer place for all". During the post-event interview, Martinez was asked what it was she felt she would bring to the district if she were elected to which she responded "My passion, my business acumen and my full, unwavering dedication. The Northern district is where I went to university... worked, and lived ever since I moved here." further stating "I care deeply for it's community, of which I am blessed to be apart." When asked if she had identified aspects of the Northern District that needed improvement she stated, as in her speech, that "Public safety is a big part of my platform. I look forward to the re-establishment of the Police Commission, where I hope to bring about more safety in the district — In particular at ULSA. Student safety is very important to me. They are the future, after all. I'd like to work with the LSPD and establish a lasting training program for the University's security team, for example." She further added that she wanted to see more community policing in the district in general. She faces keen opposition from the Democrats in the Northern District who are backing David Wu, Husband to Sophie Wu who's also aiming for a district of her own. The couple have been well-known and active members of the Los Santos community for some time now each in their own right, both having previously expressed political ambitions. Next to take the stage was Garrett Baker who was quick to proclaim his time spent "...fighting for our freedom in the army" before going on to say that this time instead he'll be "Fighting for your freedoms on the soil of great Los Santos" Baker is aiming for election in the Central District, opposed by Olivia Zhao, backed by the Democrats. He gave a decidedly short speech but presented his platform of creating more "entrepreneurial opportunities for companies of all sizes" and took a stab at other politicians as he mentioned he would be a man of action and would not be engaging in "...pointless arguments on social media" In the post-kickoff interview, Baker had decidedly more to say. He was asked why he'd picked the central district, to which he responded "...it's the heart of Los Santos, and who better to fight for it than someone that's lived there for large portions of my time here in San Andreas." He was further asked what he felt the Central District needed that he'd be working on should he be elected as councilman "More entrepreneurial opportunities for private companies, public works has been limping behind and I feel it's due time we allow for well functioning private business to just as well carry out the work. With my history of growing a trucking company on this very soil that is Los Santos, I've first-hand experienced the hardships that follow running a private business. I wish to create opportunities where there was none when I was hard at work keeping my business alive." Next to the stage was Frank Buntz, aiming for the position of Councilman in the Southern District, opposed by an independent candidate Eduardo Vargas. Buntz described the election as "Bittersweet" and went on to remind the audience attending of his career as a lawyer "It's a word many in South Central and the East Side can align with. I thought about the wonderful families I've worked with during my career as a lawyer... then I remembered the agony many of them faced from years of municipal neglect." He reminisced over the young men and women he'd represented in his past and the injustice they had allegedly faced. Buntz proceeded to discuss a story with the audience "I can recall the story of a boy whose mother died... she could've lived if the hospitals had been better. Who's father worked his fingers to the bone to put food on the table... he never got a chance to retire. A boy who faced discrimination for being a Jew, who had to resort to working two part-time jobs to support his family. That boy stands before you today... that boy is me." While the audience appeared to have mixed reactions to the story, Buntz remained firm on his stance that he was the right man for the district, claiming to owe his career as an attorney to the Southern District. He added "I've worked with local grass-roots businesses like IcyDoll, when their rights were threatened by the swamp. I've given the same message to troubled youths from Jamestown to Davis High - that the American dream is for everyone." presenting a platform of equality and assuring that "When our voice of freedom talks, Los Santos better listen." In the post-kickoff interview, Buntz was asked why he felt he was the right candidate for the district and reiterated much of the previous speech, stating that he had worked in the district for about twenty years representing citizens of South Central and beyond in court "...criminal defense trials, protecting their constitutional freedom and fighting for their civil rights." When asked what he hoped to bring to the district that it needs, he responded "In one word? Change. I'll be promoting family, freedom and future... and I'll take every step I can to ensure those values are not only protected but enhanced if I get elected." lastly stating that he'd have a campaign website available soon for interested parties to find out more. The last candidate to the stage was Ted Cook who's aiming for election in the Los Santos County District. He stands opposed by an independent candidate, Colton Reed. He began with a less conventional speech, stating that he wasn't going to bore the audience "...with the usual hooplah" Cook proceeded to claim that the county had long been ignored because "Crooks and members of the woke mob have swindled the great people of Los Santos for too long!" Cook then went on to take a jab at fellow and past politicians "Politicians with no backbone. Politicians too afraid to stand up for what's right! Too afraid to publicly back law enforcement out of fear of being attacked by the woke mob! God bless our beautiful members of law enforcement by the way, haha!" He stressed that he hoped the public would make the "right" decision in the upcoming election and vote for GOP candidates. In the post-event interview, however, Cook had more to say about his actual plans for the county district should he be elected. "I'll tell you exactly what I'll bring to the county. The love and appreciation that our residents have been missing for years." He stated, clarifying "We have all this open land up north. I'm sure you've seen it, the most /beautiful/wildlife and nature in Los Santos. But what's being done with it? Nothing. Our county needs jobs. And there's a simple solution. We stop playing games and put our resources to work, eh?" When asked further if he wanted to build on unused land in the county, he felt the word 'build' was too specific stated that he didn't want to "put a limit to what we will do with the land" adding that "Affordable housing can be built, our parks can be drastically improved." He believes that some facilities up north are in a bad state and could be improved. Though he insisted that he would never "invade our public parks" To close the evening off, both Senator Rossi and Senator Brandenburg were called to the stage. Rossi took the podium first and proudly stated that it was solely the Republican Party that fought for a fair mayoral election, and thus lead to the City Council elections being made possible at all. "Remember who fought against your best interests" he added in a direct jab at the Democratic Party "Who fought against the idea of a local elected body to serve the people of Los Santos? It was the Democratic Party" He celebrated the GOP's success and thanked the citizens of Los Santos. Brandenburg stepped up to the podium next and happily reiterated the sentiment that "The very opportunity that you have today, the opportunity and liberty to elect those who represent you, is another success of the Republican party to uphold it's promises, this time through The efforts of our Mayor, Hank Preston." Brandenburg assured that the Republican Party is a platform for change and a better future "What you see here tonight on this podium means progress, means innovation, honesty and a team that will always... and I mean always work for each and every one of you, for your interest and for a better tomorrow for you" The historic race begins now, with campaigns due to conclude quickly on the 8th of February. Candidates will spend the days until then presenting why they're the right people to represent their chosen districts. >>>FULL GALLERY<<< Comments Are: Enabled Username: Comment: