Jump to content

Should "onlyfans characters" be removed/banned, same as ERP characters?


Kappaurel

Recommended Posts

If these characters doing nothing but getting money for selling nudes and bang dudes around strip clubs, with zero character development and things in between, they should be character killed. It's in the server rules. 

They should at least make some normal RP. 

Link to comment

I believe those should already be disallowed per the rules, as already mentioned by others? It wouldn't be very relieving to think that of all the things that could be codified or done about our server rules, resources would instead be spent on addressing some group of people with the goal being to tackle bad actors who may not even be involved.

 

Even without having had any interaction with this concept myself, I can sympathize with the idea that it's reckless to implement a blanket rule that will disrupt or penalize genuine players. I don't think roleplaying "onlyfans content" in any measure does immediately or automatically label a character as existing solely for sexual purposes.

 

The thread also acknowledges this, referring to "some of those identities" instead of "all of those identities". The title refers to "banning onlyfans characters" whereas the thread talks about "banning onlyfans-only characters". "Onlyfans-only characters" should already be disallowed along "sexual-based" characters: it may just need better enforcement.

Edited by mana
  • Applaud 1
Link to comment

Let's make this really simple. The sexual/erp angle shouldn't matter.

 

What should matter is are they actually actively rping on the server? 

If the answer to that is no, they should be removed from FB and QD. 

 

That said, it should be the same for any character whether they are selling clothing, drugs, music, or nothing at all. 

 

The social apps for GTAW should be a supporting/secondary tool to increase immersion not the primary place the character exists. 

 

That said, I don't think it's an important enough issue to merit the time it would take to moderate that. Imo the admins already have more than enough to handle and its not really that detrimental when you can just block and unfollow ppl. 

 

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

its already a rule... rule 19?

people saying "ban these characters immediately" are probably salty because they're not making bank like some models. There's a market for it, and people will make moeny. If you're not buying it, it does not effect you at all. Report to RPQM if you think someone is breaking rule 19.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment

I roleplayed a porn actress before, I can say, that sometimes it is hard to even interact with others, cause don't lynch me for this, but I have yet to meet a roleplayer, that doesn't hit on someone one way or another. And as soon as people find out what your character's job is, they will make a move, in 9/10 times.

But it's not all gloomy, I was suprised  to have been actually asked to sign a porn mag IG for people who recognized my character.

That said, it's a character's job, not meaning of life. Irl people in this business, don't even wanna hear anything about sex while not at work.

I personally don't consider characters who only exist on FB as actual characters.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

It's a great place for people who are not sexually active in real life after all, so keep them. It'll bring more players if nothing. Not like every other character doesn't have naked menyoos with horse dicks and anime boobs. 

Edited by Zorbe
Link to comment
38 minutes ago, root said:

If these characters doing nothing but getting money for selling nudes and bang dudes around strip clubs, with zero character development and things in between, they should be character killed. It's in the server rules. 

They should at least make some normal RP. 

I don't agree with you, dude. Your point is nowhere to be seen. If you have some character development aside weird sexual stuff? You're cool to exploit your kinks on a game, but if that's the only thing you do? Nah, you're just weird then. LOL. Either ban ERP for good or keep this a 13 year old ERP cage.

Link to comment

Ayo let's report Nymphomaniacs irl since its clearly non rp for people. 

 

For legal reasons thats a joke, but the underlying point still stands. The community's response to smthn is always to try flat out target a wide group, when in fact the bad apples are a small bunch. 

 

lovejoy.jpg

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Just now, Zorbe said:

I don't agree with you, dude. Your point is nowhere to be seen. If you have some character development aside weird sexual stuff? You're cool to exploit your kinks on a game, but if that's the only thing you do? Nah, you're just weird then. LOL. Either ban ERP for good or keep this a 13 year old ERP cage.

What?

The point is, and in the rules, you should not have a character only to sell nudes and work as a stripper at nights, this character should have basic life as well, except for logging to dance naked and do some "/ad export available", not being sexual active in real life so you do in the a  game it's not an excuse, it's sick and I hope nobodies winner is out when he's roleplaying with my female character as for example ._.

Link to comment
Just now, Mecovy said:

Ayo let's report Nymphomaniacs irl since its clearly non rp for people. 

 

For legal reasons thats a joke, but the underlying point still stands. The community's response to smthn is always to try flat out target a wide group, when in fact the bad apples are a small bunch. 

 

lovejoy.jpg

no-dancing-goose.gif


Bad apples are small groups but also noticeable louder.
I mean. I could just cause issues by creating a character, create drama until that stuff is banned and call it a day.
Maliciously, there are that sort of people here in this community. I got a few encounters with them.

Link to comment
  • Wuhtah locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...