Jump to content

Evolving the Illegal Community Regime (IFM)


khadijeh.

Recommended Posts

On 2/2/2022 at 8:41 AM, Moonsong said:

Grats! Please start by overturning the ridiculous ruling regarding population, for the benefit of illegal and legal roleplay as I feel it's a massive loophole that's being abused to the detriment of roleplay.

Yeah, I shouldn’t be forced to RP a city that has 100 people in it when they are online. It sounds ridiculous even saying it lol

Edited by Solomons
Link to comment

For transparency's sake as it was mentioned in the OP, why have more popular members of the community been allowed to open unofficial groups freely while others have had their threads locked the instant they're posted? Seems a little unfair to shut out the entire community from posting new group threads while giving the go-ahead to others who are coincidently friends of the people who shut down said unofficial groups.

 

If this was something that was determined behind closed doors it'd be nice to know why because to a lot of people GTAW's OOC favouritism and "unbeatable transparency" seems to be rearing it's funky-booty-ass head once again. 

Edited by BINGBONGAMERICA
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, BINGBONGAMERICA said:

For transparency's sake as it was mentioned in the OP, why have more popular members of the community been allowed to open unofficial groups freely while others have had their threads locked the instant they're posted? Seems a little unfair to shut out the entire community from posting new group threads while giving the go-ahead to others who are coincidently friends of the people who shut down said unofficial groups.

They applied for their groups as a faction to be posted, they say this when the thread of random posted groups are unlocked and tell them to apply.

 

Should honestly stay this way.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...