ThatDutchPerson Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 (edited) On 12/27/2021 at 12:00 PM, Coburn said: Username: SAPARBro30 Comment: If it was G6 why were they writing articles about the SA port authority rangers? (SAPAR) as well lmao. Quit hating on G6 #greenlivesmatter Username: SeoHeeMin Comment: -comment removed by user- Edited January 7, 2022 by ThatDutchPerson Link to comment
Coburn Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 37 minutes ago, Dama said: Username: JasonXOChen Comment: I can confirm that this woman has been harassing me daily for no absolute reason. She keeps taking multiple photographs of me and posts them online. Moreover, she called the cops on me because I was playing around the area with my bicycle. Also, she assaulted me physically by attempting to push me into the water when I don't know how to swim. Definitely, I'd suggest everyone to stay away from her. I moved to another state so she wouldn't harm me. Username: GroupSex30 Comment: Sorry to hear man! Hope you're doing well in the state though! Sad to see young talent get harassed out of our amazing state. Link to comment
joshua Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 Username: Austism Comment: NIGGA I MADE IT IM ON THE NEWS IM BIG TIME LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 1 Link to comment
PeopleKind Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 3 hours ago, ThatDutchPerson said: Username: SeoHeeMin Comment: 3 out of 5 articles were made in the interest of Gruppe Sechs. 2 of those 3 to defame and slander someone that turned them down and openly ousted them for harassment. 3th article is to praise their so called goodness. the other 2 is ramdom to further legitimize it as a ''legitimate'' news outlet. And the same points raised in both articles are the same points made by Will Flanary personally to try and slander me in comment sections. It doesn't take real rocket science to find out who is behind this fakenews media. Username: cheesecakefactory Comment: if its clearly "fake news" why bother responding to begin with? just makes you look bad. dont give them the attention they so desperately want and they'll get bored, not very hard. plus its no secret that will flanary is a wannabe cop that failed every LEO agencies recruitment so hes stuck being a fake mallcop Link to comment
ThatDutchPerson Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 12 minutes ago, PeopleKind said: Username: cheesecakefactory Comment: if its clearly "fake news" why bother responding to begin with? just makes you look bad. dont give them the attention they so desperately want and they'll get bored, not very hard. plus its no secret that will flanary is a wannabe cop that failed every LEO agencies recruitment so hes stuck being a fake mallcop Username: SeoHeeMin Comment: First it was funny, I get the paper is meant for satire and I really don't mind some good satire. I even shared the previous article on facebrowser as it got me a good laugh. But this isn't satire. This is firstly using a deceased person deemed a hero for their own personal gain. Second, this article is spreading I'd be a child molestor, which is a criminal offense of slander and defamation. This isn't satire anymore. Link to comment
books Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 (edited) Username: JaysonTatumFangirl Comment: Pulitzer's in the mail. Edited December 27, 2021 by books Link to comment
i dont wanna od in LA Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 12 minutes ago, ThatDutchPerson said: Username: SeoHeeMin Comment: First it was funny, I get the paper is meant for satire and I really don't mind some good satire. I even shared the previous article on facebrowser as it got me a good laugh. But this isn't satire. This is firstly using a deceased person deemed a hero for their own personal gain. Second, this article is spreading I'd be a child molestor, which is a criminal offense of slander and defamation. This isn't satire anymore. username: 659696969696969696996 comment: slander and defamation arent criminal offenses Link to comment
Cocaine Capital Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 17 minutes ago, ThatDutchPerson said: Username: SeoHeeMin Comment: First it was funny, I get the paper is meant for satire and I really don't mind some good satire. I even shared the previous article on facebrowser as it got me a good laugh. But this isn't satire. This is firstly using a deceased person deemed a hero for their own personal gain. Second, this article is spreading I'd be a child molestor, which is a criminal offense of slander and defamation. This isn't satire anymore. username: RedheadedMenacecomment: Slander and Defamation is only a civil tort in America u fucking commie. Go back to where you belong. Link to comment
Coburn Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 53 minutes ago, ThatDutchPerson said: Username: SeoHeeMin Comment: First it was funny, I get the paper is meant for satire and I really don't mind some good satire. I even shared the previous article on facebrowser as it got me a good laugh. But this isn't satire. This is firstly using a deceased person deemed a hero for their own personal gain. Second, this article is spreading I'd be a child molestor, which is a criminal offense of slander and defamation. This isn't satire anymore. Username: BobCatGal30 Comment: You're a child molester?? Jesus christ how are you still allowed out in the street! Disgusting. Link to comment
Ari- Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 Username: SharonWillow9522699 Comment: OH HOW SICKENING ,,, I LOVED DESMOND BROWM HE WAS SUCH A SWEAT HEART TO ME WHEN I HAD PNEUMONIA ,,,GOD BLESS 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now