MvP Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 (edited) A Turkish SA-MP server was using this system. And that was incredibly useful. When you join the server, you need to go to the bank to open an account. While you are opening an account, you also get an account number. Players can send money to each other offline via these account numbers. (Example: /transfer TargetAccount Amount) When you use the command above, system shows you the target's name like this and asks you that you are approving or not: Receiver: Otto Schneider Amount: 10.000$ If you approve this transaction, please write /approvetransfer When player uses /approvetransfer command, the money transfers to the receiver's account. + If you add a bank page on the UCP, players can see the transactions and they can send money to each other via their bank account numbers. Edited April 24, 2018 by MvP 1 Link to comment
Jauss Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 It's fine and all. But this has been discussed and suggested several times. I like it, but something like this needs protection from people abusing OOC money transactions to their other characters, which would also be leading to abuse of the current paycheck system. However I think that we are working on this, currently. Making OOC transfers a thing. But its gonna take some time, due to the fact that there has to be some sort of protection. Link to comment
Lance Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 If it's possible to make this system balanced and minimize possibilities of abuse, I'm all for it, sounds very interesting yet simple. Link to comment
Gangstafary Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 If, like Lance says, abusing change is reduced to a minimum, it'd be great but I think that first we should have the IRS and money laundering script implemented. Link to comment
Portz Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 There's always ways and smart enough people to figure out how to reduce the chances of abuse. Disable transfer to characters connected to the same account being one. I will always support this idea. Link to comment
Lance Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 I will forward it since it got some support. If it's impossible to minimize abuse of this system, should be not implemented. Link to comment
Recommended Posts