LSGOP condemns Orosco amid Domestic Abuse Allegations

[NexusExodus]

Los Santos Republican Party

LSGOP condemns Orosco amid Domestic Abuse Allegations

9/22/2020

 

We unequivocally condemn the heinous acts outlined in the recent expose by LSNN wherein Mr. Richard Orosco terrorized and physically abused Ms. Dianna Pierce. The LSGOP is a staunch advocate of the rights of women of all ages, races, and creeds to live their lives free from the harrows of domestic violence and their right to be believed when they have the bravery to come forward with their story. 

 

Let’s be overwhelmingly clear here:

 

We believe women.

 

The aspect that is perhaps most troubling about this story is the fact that the journalists had Law Enforcement officials who corroborated Ms. Pierce’s story thus bringing to light the tangible horror of this allegation. 

 

When Ms. Marchese spoke out about our former candidate Alexander Orleans, we listened when she said she had not been abused at any time. We still made the decision to remove him from our ballot because frankly the voters deserve more than a spectacle of accusation, allegation, and court drama from their candidates.

 

Voters deserve to decide based on the policies that affect their lives on a regular basis, the kitchen table issues that bring Americans together to make a positive change for the future. This is why it is disturbing that the Democratic Party of Los Santos has not only sought to silence Ms. Pierce’s heartbreaking story by attacking her credibility but instead of listening and empathizing with her account and acting by their moral values, have decided instead to defend their candidate blindly.

 

Let us be clear: We stand with Dianna Pierce and wish her best in what is bound to be a long journey of recovery and slander by those who would find her story to be politically inconvenient.

We as a city must hold a higher standard for our elected officials, red or blue, black or white, rich or poor. We’ve got to do the right thing by the citizens of this fair city. If we are inclined to silence the voice of brave women like Ms. Pierce or hold onto candidates with troubling domestic violence allegations because it's inconvenient politically, we risk losing the very moral fabric and fortitude that binds us all together as Americans. We hope the Democratic Party of Los Santos holds that high standard alongside us, their actions not words will be the testament to their character in the coming days. 

 

Republican Party Chairman

 

 

Edited September 22, 2020 by NexusExodus

[Al-Malikah]

Username: legalbeagle992

Comment: well said

[Midsummer Night's Dream]

User: Orwellian

Comment: 

Quote

Voters deserve to decide based on the policies that affect their lives on a regular basis, the kitchen table issues that bring Americans together to make a positive change for the future.

 

The problem here is that I have not seen much discussion about policy.  The LSGOP's statements in the LSNN's Election Guide are extremely vague — almost as vague as "positive change for the future."  

 

The only concrete proposals I've seen are in Alex Flynn's manifesto, which contains some details about small business loans and public-private funding to improve housing, among other things.  The concern with his proposals, however, is that they leave out details. He does not explain how he intends to execute any of those proposals.  This is very concerning.  What happens if the money he earmarks for "real estate agencies" does not go where it's intended?  What if those agencies misuse the funds?  There is no discussion of auditing controls to minimize waste or prevent fraud; there is no discussion of how agencies might qualify; there is not much discussion other than to say that any private agency promising to improve housing will have access to public funds.  Flynn comes the closest to something concrete, but that's concerning because he still leaves too much in the dark.

 

 

 

 

Edited September 23, 2020 by Midsummer Night's Dream

[NexusExodus]

5 minutes ago, Midsummer Night's Dream said:

User: Orwellian

Comment: 

 

The problem here is that I have not seen much discussion about policy.  The LSGOP's statements in the LSNN's Election Guide are extremely vague — almost as vague as "positive change for the future."  

 

The only concrete proposals I've seen are in Alex Flynn's manifesto, which contains some details about small business loans and public-private funding to improve housing.  The concern with his proposals, however, is that they leave out details. He does not explain how he intends to execute any of those proposals.  This is very concerning.  What happens if the money he earmarks for "real estate agencies" does not go where it's intended?  What if those agencies misuse the funds?  There is no discussion of auditing controls to minimize waste or prevent fraud; there is no discussion of how agencies might qualify; there is not much discussion other than to say that any private agency promising to improve housing will have access to public funds.  Flynn comes the closest to something concrete, but that's concerning because he still leaves too much in the dark.

 

 

 

 

Username: 1984

Comment: Don’t suppose you read their public manifesto lol.

[Midsummer Night's Dream]

18 minutes ago, NexusExodus said:

Username: 1984

Comment: Don’t suppose you read their public manifesto lol.

User: Orwellian  

Comment:  You mean the one called “The Halford Agenda” where the “Open Doors Policy” contains extremely vague statements of principle; where “Oversight” in the same section also contains a very vague statement of principle and vague promise to implement legislation; where “Wage Laws” and “Support Business” contain some proposals but no details on how to achieve or implement them; where the “Crime and Safety” and “Community Outreach” sections contain vague statements of principle and no details on how to achieve those goals?
 

A manifesto can be a statement of principles. That’s fine. But, again, where are the details?  
 

They weren’t in the LSNN interview either. 
 

 

 

 

Edited September 23, 2020 by Midsummer Night's Dream

[Dumbass]

Username: los santos nonce network
Comment: A FEW DAYS AGO AT UNIFORMS ONE OF ALEX FLYNN'S FRIENDS, STEPH, HIT A DISABLED GIRL WITH KNUCKLE DUSTERS DURING HIS GREET&MEET AND WHEN ONE OF THE VICTIM'S FRIENDS TRIED TO STOP STEPH FROM KILLING THAT POOR GIRL, ALEX FLYNN TOLD HIS GOOD FRIEND CONSTANTIN DORN TO SHOOT HIM.
 

[Ink]

Username: Ink

Comment: you trust women, just everywhere except in your list of candidates right? the republican party which stands with women couldn't even find one woman to run for office in a world where 50% of humans are female nice. sounds like you stand with woman so long as they're way behind you and fit your agenda

 

yeah i'm not buying this "we trust woman" shit at all. just more slimy politician shit can't trust a thing. same party that broke into tears and cried about "republicans don't approve" now stand with women only when they're against Dems.