Search the Community

Sen. Jones Issues A Public Apology As Sen. Brandenburg Calls For Impeachment Written By Gabriel Stone, 24/06/2023 Senator Diana Jones has issued a public apology following an outburst on social media from Senator Andrew Brandenburg calling for her impeachment. The outcry comes after Jones, according to Brandenburg, "stepped on every rule and principle the Senate stands for" during a session held on the 23rd of June. Diana Jones, who is not the Chairman of the Committee, allegedly requested that Senator Rossi allow her to chair a session and had promised no votes would be held, but upon chairing the session held two votes. Furthermore, during these votes she had allegedly voted 'fraudulently' in Brandenburg's name, he says that a vote should note have been held at all as he had walked out of the session and therefore the senate had no longer been at a quorum. He also called Jones out on her supposed hypocrisy when discussing matters of senate attendance when she herself was absent for the majority of the previous year. He stated "Since the elections of 2022, Senator Jones has one of the lowest presence rates. Senator Jones disappeared for almost a year after the elections, leaving former Senator Luca Giraldi to deal with everything. Basically, she put Giraldi there to take the blame, while she was nowhere to be found almost the entire year." Tacked onto the end of his message is a warning "This is who and what you vote when you choose Democrat. Lies, deception, hypocrisy and violation of personal rights. Vote fraud is the new Democratic behavior." followed by an image showing Jones stating that she would not hold any votes during the session when messaging Rossi. Above: The message Jones sent to Senator Rossi. I met with Senator Jones to hear, in her words, what happened. She first explained that the topic of the meeting was Senator attendance and during this she had laid out all senator attendance in the last month. She states that attendance has been poor from all sides and that only twice, if counting the session in question, had a quorum been reached. A quorum being an attendance of half the members of a committee or the senate. She further elaborated that Brandenburg had chaired a meeting earlier this week where enough people had signed up but not enough actually attended to meet a quorum, which in turn meant a vote could not be held and the budgets for all major departments in the state were to be delayed as a result. She admits to telling Rossi that she would not vote, but claims this only referred to the outstanding resolutions such as the LGBT Pride Month resolution. She claims she didn't abuse the opportunity granted to her for political gain, and instead held votes to state the opinion of the committee. According to her these were as follows: "It is the position of the Committee of Rules, Ethics and Government that attendance is crucial to the operation of the legislature." and "Pursuant to the crucial nature of attendance, it is the opinion of the Committee of Rules, Ethics and Government that a total administration of senator attendance in the 2022 — 2023 must be compiled, reported and published." Jones states that "These are not partisan issues. These are not political topics. These are topics that we can all agree to, that I believe even Andrew Brandenburg would have agreed to, had he stuck around just a minute longer" Jones further stated that Brandenburg left without allowing her the chance to explain what was being voted on. She placed a vote of 'abstain' in Andrew's absence and she states "A vote can be yea or nay. Beyond yea or nay, representatives have the right -not- to vote. This is what we call abstaining from voting. "Abstain" is not a vote, "abstain" is just a way to let the chair know that you're not voting. Another way to let the chair know that you're not voting is by just not voting. What I did was administer the fact that Andrew Brandenburg did not vote." She further clarifies that she did not say that Brandenburg himself had spoken the word "Abstain" Jones then addressed the accusation that she had held a vote without a quorum present. She states that she did hold a vote without half of the members of the senate present but that it was not against the rules in any state. She states that the quorum of a session remains until the end of the hearing regardless of whether or not a senator walks out. Jones also makes note of a time this happened in the past with 'Senate Bill 108' in which former Senator Giraldi was expelled from a session leaving only two senators, Rossi and Brandenburg. "That was not a quorum. Andrew did not object then, and instead, a vote was held." Jones stated. When I asked Jones to elaborate further on how she had not abused the opportunity to chair a session, she brought up Pride Month and the Glorious Month of June, a recent focus of controversial discussion. The resolution to recognize Pride Month was blocked by Rossi. She claimed that "...If I were given full control of the committee today, I could have quickly handled that bill without taking Adrian Rossi's opinion into account. He would have let me chair it, and I would have abused that for my own gains. But these are not my own gains. These are everyone's gains. Everyone can agree that attendance is important, and everyone can agree that the legislature cannot operate without attendance. " Jones admitted openly that her own attendance was not up to par and that she would publish that equally even if it reflects badly on her. Despite all this she claims she acted fully within her rights whilst chairing the session, however wanted to put out an apology after having acted in 'bad faith'. "I did not operate in good faith today. I knew that this decision would be controversial. I knew that it may lead to trouble, maybe even my impeachment. I knew that I was acting within the rules, yet skimming by their edges so closely that I was at risk, and I was putting the integrity of the committee at risk. I have to apologize for not acting in good faith, for not being fair and nice. I made the choices that I made because this is a -serious- issue. Because without attendance of the senate, the legislature will not work. There are entire departments waiting on their funding, and Andrew Brandenburg cannot pass his appropriations because senator attendance is just too low. There are agencies waiting on crucial legislation, like the Aviation Code amendments, but they cannot receive the rights they need to operate because senator attendance is just too low. Senators must be held accountable. Senators must be held to a high standard. Senators have their seats and they must -use- them. I must, too. I've been too absent in the past, and I must take responsibility for that, and that is exactly why I am emphasizing on this. I know that Andrew Brandenburg agrees with me on that. He walked out because he expected a political move from me, but no. I did not aim to punish anyone today, or address political issues. I did not act in good faith today, and for that, I apologize. But what I did was a crucial first step to ensuring accountability for all senators." She concluded the interview with one final statement praising Brandenburg "I'd like to commend Andrew Brandenburg for continuing to dedicate himself to making sure our departments get the money they require." In conclusion, Jones feels she broke no rules but admits to having acted in bad faith that day. Brandenburg claimed that if no public apology was made by Jones that he would be proceeding with impeachment procedures against her. Jones admits to knowing that there had been a risk of her actions leading to impeachment, though it remains to be seen whether Brandenburg will proceed with his plans following the above public statement. Full Transcript: Comments Are: Enabled Name: Comment:

Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade Sworn In As Giraldi Accuses Republicans Of Ulterior Motives Over Resolution Written by Gabriel Stone - 3rd March 2023 Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade's Full Speech Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade: Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed guests. Chief Burke, Governor Brandt, District Attorney Harper, and everyone else. Thank you for your attendance. As I stand here today, having taken the oath of office administered by our very own Chief Justice Jones, to serve as your 50th Lieutenant Governor, I am filled with an overwhelming sense of gratitude and responsibility. It is an honor and a privilege to be entrusted with the duty of serving the people of this state, and I pledge to fulfill that duty with unwavering commitment and integrity. Tonight, as I take on this new role, I am reminded of the many individuals who have served our states before me. They were men and women of vision, courage, and determination who worked tirelessly to make our state a better place for all its citizens. They believed in the ideals of democracy, freedom, and justice, and they fought to uphold those values even in the face of adversity. It is our turn to carry on that legacy. We are the inheritors of a great tradition, and we must continue to build upon it with the same passion and dedication as our forefathers. Now! I know there are some folks out there who want to tear us down. Tell us we're not good enough. They want to tell us that we're too divisive, too partisan, too whatever. But let me tell you something: they're wrong! We're Americans, and we don't back down from a challenge. As your Lieutenant Governor, I will work tirelessly to ensure that our state remains a beacon of hope and opportunity for all its citizens. I will work to promote economic growth and job creation. To provide better education, and to safeguard the rights and safety of all our citizens. But more than anything, I will work to strengthen the bonds that hold us together as people. For our strength as a nation lies not in our individual accomplishments, but in our ability to come together as one people, united in our love for this great land. So let us pledge ourselves today to the ideals of patriotism. To the values of democracy, and to the principles of freedom and justice that have made our nation great. Let us work together to build a brighter future for our children and grandchildren, and let us never forget that we are all Americans, united in our love for this great country, and the ideals for which it stands for. Ladies and gentlemen. It is an honor to have you all here tonight, and I personally thank you all for witnessing this moment. Thank you all, and God bless America and the State of San Andreas. Above is the patriotic speech given by the newly appointed Lieutenant Governor Noah Wade who was sworn in officially on the 28th of February in the Senate Chambers, San Andreas State Capitol. Chief Justice Morgan Jones was present to administer Governor Wade's oath of office. Over the last month, Governor Wade has become increasingly more visible in the public eye, releasing public statements and personally attending disasters such as the wind farm fire and dam fire where he ordered the evacuation of nearby residential areas in Mirror Park. Following recent events, Governor Wade posted on Facebrowser that he was honored to have been chosen to serve as the 50th Lieutenant Governor of San Andreas State and that the ceremony would take place prior to the senate session on the 28th. Governor Wade prides himself in his steadfast values, patriotism and fearlessness as an American and vowed not to be swayed by recent events. Prior to his appointment he had released a public statement calling The Chosen One the "Morse Code Moron" and a lunatic, stating that "...we will not be intimidated by cowardly actions. We will remain steadfast and united, and we will prevail over this individual." This came as a loud and clear message to The Chosen One from Governor Wade. Shortly following the senate session, the Capitol was evacuated by PD Metro following a bomb threat that was confirmed to be under Governor Brandt's car shortly after, The Chosen One's answer to Governor Wade's statement. Following this a $150,000 assassination order was released by TCO aimed at Wade and his family, to which Wade posted a Facebrowser message saying "Trust the process. #Only150K" which some have seen as a brave stance, while others consider it to be needlessly endangering his family. Since then Governor Wade has put a $300,000 bounty on The Chosen One for any information leading to the identification or apprehension of who he calls "The Morse Code Moron" The back and forth begins a dangerous game within the city of Los Santos (read more about it here). The Senate session immediately following Governor Wade's swearing in became a heated debate. With the recent wind farm incident still fresh in everyone's minds, a resolution " To commend the actions of not only firefighters related to the windmill incident but also firefighters all across our State of San Andreas." was introduced by Senator Rossi and cosponsored by Senator Brandenburg. Above in the gallery, San Fire who had assisted largely in the rescue of the downed firefighters was in attendance. Senator Rossi presented his resolution, saying that "...this resolution seeks to not only commend and honor our injured firemen at our unfortunate fire at the windmills out in the County, but this resolution also seeks to also honor public service men and women, and to raise awareness for conditions. One of these conditions is the requirement for more fire prevention needs out in our counties and industrial zone." One such issue that the fire department faced during the Senora wind farm fire was that there were not accessible water resources nearby, the resolution acknowledges this. The resolution unanimously passed the committee vote on the 14th of February, however Senator Giraldi had not been present for the vote. He then became the only nay vote on the 28th as he heavily opposed the introduction of the resolution. A move some considered 'being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian' while others appeared to be considering what he had to say. He began his opposition by saying "I find myself, as I speak, starting to walk a very dangerous path. But it is one I am willing to walk, as to oppose bills and resolutions based only in populism." He claimed to have the highest of respect for first responders, but found the resolution being introduced for the two firefighters injured at the wind farm "offensive". The basis of his argument was that he believed Republican senators to be using the injury of two firefighters for personal clout and to save face. He stated that it was being painted as a unique event, when in fact responders are injured and killed regularly and receive no such resolutions. He made reference to the fallen Los Santos Fire Department Captain, Lucas Morel, who gave his life in the line of duty and mentioned that there was no resolution for him either. "This is nothing but a resolution to save face, Senator Rossi. Save face for your party, with an astonishing majority. This resolution has nothing of what you spoke. This doesn't grant funds for new hydrants. This doesn't provide the LSFD or any other agency with more equipment, tools." Senator Giraldi stated whilst raising the resolution document above his head. "This is populism. This is not for the firefighters. This is for you and for your party." Senator Brandenburg was the first to be granted time in response to Senator Giraldi's opposition, stating that he didn't "...even know where to begin" as he'd expected the Democrat side to understand the resolution. He called out the Democrat party on their lack of resolution for the events for August 27th, stating that Giraldi has just as much means to submit resolutions as the rest of the senate. He referred to the opposition as "the political games of the Democrats" To respond to Giraldi's claims of the resolution having no real benefit for the fire department, Brandenburg asserted that the republican party had begun correspondence with "...the competent authorities in order to improve the fire prevention in the State and to increase the number of fire hydrants across the whole State" and by doing so, stated that they were not only honoring the injured firefighters but making their jobs easier in the future. Brandenburg concluded his time by saying he was disappointed that instead of making this "...a bipartisan effort for our first responders, the Democrat side chooses to pick old bones and looks for the needle in the haystack, focusing on political strife instead of what's important" Senator Rossi was recognized for time next and backed up Brandenburg, stating quickly how appalled he was by the claims and that the resolution "isn't politics. This is being responsible, and this is being a human being" he demanded that Giraldi turn and face and tell the public and present service men and women that he did not support their recognition and did not support the senate passing a resolution in their honor. Senator Giraldi did stand up and face the gallery, asking first the LSPD where their resolution was when they were shot during a traffic stop. Then he asked the Park Rangers where their resolution is when they're injured protecting state parks. He then addressed the State Fire Marshals and asked them where their resolution was when they inhaled toxic fumes. "I am sure each and every single one of you has lost at least one colleague on the line of duty. And he had NO resolution." He vowed that he would not "...let the republicans weaponize [them]" nor would he sit silent, making mention of all those who did not have a resolution because Senator Rossi, in Giraldi's words, "...didn't fancy visiting them at the hospital" Giraldi demanded, while speaking out of turn, that Rossi face the public and speak just as he had done. Rossi did not face the public but had strong words for Giraldi. "I've served many years in the Los Santos Police Department. I served up to the rank of sergeant. Don't you ever question what intentions I have with' something' like this. Ever. Again." He brought up the two times that Giraldi had been removed from committee sessions before and that debates should be had on Giraldi's own time, apologizing to spectators who had to hear the debate. Harsh remarks were made during the voting process and then the session moved on to bill number 106, introduced by Senator Luca Giraldi "A Bill meant to correct the mistake of forgetting Vespucci Promenade private property owners in the former VB-MVR ACT" having found that certain private property can only be accessed via the Vespucci Promenade and this was not mentioned in the former VB-MVR ACT. The amendment called for would allow motor vehicles owned by any owner of private property that can only be accessed along the Vespucci Promenade to do so, though not at speeds higher than thirty miles per hour except where an emergency may be occurring. The bill passed the final vote unanimously. The building was evacuated minutes following this due to the bomb planted beneath Governor Brandt's vehicle. Full Resolution Transcript - Full Vespucci Beach Regulations Amendment Transcript Website: https://gtaw.link/atomic If you like our articles, now you can support our writers directly via donations. (Donations will not receive any personal favours or bias in articles. They only serve to further support our writers) Gabriel Stone - 010043224

The topic will follow Tucker Meier's life.

SAN ANDREAS STATE GOVERNMENT "Eureka!" History of San Andreas Spanish Rule The first Europeans to explore the San Andreas coast were the members of a Spanish sailing expedition led by Portuguese captain Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo; they entered San Diego Bay on September 28, 1542, and reached at least as far north as San Miguel Island. Privateer and explorer Francis Drake explored and claimed an undefined portion of the San Andreas coast in 1579, landing north of the future city of San Fierro. The first Asians to set foot on what would be the United States occurred in 1587, when Filipino sailors arrived in Spanish ships at Morro Bay. Sebastián Vizcaíno explored and mapped the coast of San Andreas in 1602 for New Spain, sailing as far north as Cape Mendocino. After the Portolà expedition of 1769–70, Spanish missionaries led by Junipero Serra began setting up 21 San Andreas Missions on or near the coast of Alta (Upper) San Andreas, beginning in San Diego. During the same period, Spanish military forces built several forts (presidios) and three small towns (pueblos). The San Fierro Mission grew into the city of San Fierro, and two of the pueblos grew into the cities of Los Santos and San Jose. Several other smaller cities and towns also sprang up surrounding the various Spanish missions and pueblos, which remain to this day. Mexican Rule In 1821, the Mexican War of Independence gave Mexico (including San Andreas) independence from Spain. For the next 25 years, Alta San Andreas remained as remote, sparsely populated, northwestern administrative district of the newly independent country of Mexico. The missions, which controlled most of the best land in the state, were secularized by 1834 and became the property of the Mexican government. The governor granted many square leagues of land to others with political influence. These huge ranchos or cattle ranches emerged as the dominant institutions of Mexican San Andreas. San Andreas Republic and conquest In 1846, a group of American settlers in and around Sonoma rebelled against Mexican rule during the Beaver Flag Revolt. Afterwards, rebels raised the Beaver Flag (featuring a beaver, a star, a blue stripe and the words "San Andreas Republic") at Sonoma. The Republic's only president was William B. Ide, who played a pivotal role during the Beaver Flag Revolt. This revolt by American settlers served as a prelude to the later American military invasion of San Andreas and was closely coordinated with nearby American military commanders. The San Andreas Republic was short lived; the same year marked the outbreak of the Mexican–American War (1846–48). When Commodore John D. Sloat of the United States Navy sailed into Monterey Bay and began the military occupation of San Andreas by the United States, Northern San Andreas capitulated in less than a month to the United States forces. After a series of defensive battles in Southern San Andreas, the Treaty of Cahuenga was signed on January 13, 1847, securing American control in San Andreas. Early American Period - the Gold Rush In 1848, only one week before the official American annexation of the area, gold was discovered in San Andreas, this being an event which was to forever alter both the state's demographics and its finances. Soon afterward, a massive influx of immigration into the area resulted, as prospectors and miners arrived by the thousands. The population burgeoned with San Andreas citizens, Europeans, Chinese and other immigrants during the great San Andreas Gold Rush. By the time of San Andreas' application for statehood in 1850, the settler population of San Andreas had multiplied to 100,000. By 1854, more than 300,000 settlers had come. Between 1847 and 1870, the population of San Fierro increased from 500 to 150,000. San Andreas was suddenly no longer a sparsely populated backwater, but seemingly overnight it had grown into a major population center. Government and politics San Andreas State Government - Overview The capital of San Andreas is located within Los Santos. The state is organized into three branches of government—the executive branch consisting of the governor and the other constitutional officers; the legislative branch consisting of the Senate; and the judicial branch consisting of the Supreme Court of San Andreas and lower courts. The state also allows ballot propositions: direct participation of the electorate by initiative, referendum, recall, and ratification. Executive branch The San Andreas executive branch consists of the governor and five other constitutional officers: lieutenant governor, attorney general, secretary of state, state treasurer, and state superintendent of public instruction. Agencies under the direction of a secretary that report directly to the governor are cabinet-level agencies. Some agencies such as the Secretary of State, Attorney General, and State Treasurer are headed by independent appointed officials. The vast majority of state government agencies and departments are headquartered in Los Santos or in parts of Los Santos County near the city of Los Santos; in turn, the larger agencies and departments also have local offices around the state which report to headquarters in Los Santos. Legislative branch The San Andreas State Legislature is a unicameral legislature composed of the San Andreas State Senate. The State Senate convenes at the San Andreas State Capitol in Los Santos. The San Andreas State Senate consists of a 40-member Senate. Senators serve four-month terms. Members of the Senate are not subject to term limits. The Lieutenant Governor is the ex officio President of the Senate, and may only cast a vote to break a tie. The President pro tempore is elected by the majority party caucus, followed by confirmation of the full Senate. Other leaders, such as the majority and minority leaders, are elected by their respective party caucuses according to each party's strength in the chamber. Judicial branch San Andreas' judiciary system is the largest in the United States with a total of 1,600 judges (the federal system has only about 840). At the apex is the three-member Supreme Court of San Andreas, while the San Andreas Courts of Appeal serve as the primary appellate courts and the San Andreas Superior Courts serve as the primary trial courts. (( The Judicial Branch is managed by the JSA faction. )) ((Out of Character)) Our goal is to create a realistic portrayal of a US State Government heavily influenced by the California Government and bring many elements of government that was handled OOC to its associated IC institutions. If you have any questions about this faction or looking for ways to get involved feel free to contact us anytime IC or OOC. Join us on discord!

NEWS • Politics Written by Yunisa DELGADO-FLORES • May 14th, 2022 Resolution to condemn Roe vs. Wade leaker enters the SA State Senate The SAGOP shares their theories as to the leaker's identity, as well as expressing their stance on abortion following the Roe vs. Wade leak The State Capitol building, May 13th, 2022 - Alan Kim. Resolution 28, a resolution seeing to condemn the leaker of the Roe vs. Wade opinion draft, was recently introduced to the State Senate by Senator Adrian Rossi (R). On May the 3rd, 2022 an opinion draft was leaked to the press regarding the overturning of the 1973 case Roe vs. Wade, a landmark case that secured a woman's right to access abortion clinics and treatments without government restrictions, as well as the 1993 case Planned Parenthood vs. Casey which disallowed states to place an "undue burden" on women seeking abortions. The draft, written by Justice Alito of the US Supreme Court, contains The removal of Roe vs. Wade would put a woman's right to abortion at risk across the nation. As it stands, there are 16 states that have the right to abortion enshrined in law, including the democrat-leaning states of Colorado, New Jersey and Illinois, and 14 states that have laws in place ready to restrict abortions following Roe vs. Wade's reversal, which include the republican-leaning states of Arkansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma. San Andreas, by the time this article has been released, has no law neither protecting a woman's access to abortion clinics nor any bill planning to restrict a woman's access to abortion treatments. An attempt to pass a bill enshrining a woman's right to access safe and legal abortions was introduced by former senator Edward Ulf (D) in 2021. The Women's Health Act of 2021 would have secured the right of medical clinics across San Andreas to legally conduct abortions, while also enabling and supporting a woman's choice to either abort or keep the fetus in the legislature. It would have enshrined the Roe vs. Wade ruling into the San Andreas Legislature. The Women's Health Act of 2021 failed to reach the floor. Sen. Rossi stated in an interview that the reason for this was due to other bills being "given priority", partially due to the ruling of Roe vs. Wade still standing. Resolution 28, named A Resolution to Condemn the U.S. Supreme Court Draft Leaker, was proposed by Sen. Rossi. The resolution claims that the leak was politically motivated and suggested it undermines the Justices' ability to act impartially. It calls for the leaker's immediate disbarment and removal from the US Supreme Court. The resolution also commends Justice John Roberts for a "swift response" in confirming the validity of the leak. On the day of the leak, Justice Roberts directed the court marshal to launch an investigation into the identity and source of the leak. If the resolution were to pass, the State Senate would officially condemn the leaker on the national stage. The San Andreas GOP made a press release condemning the leaker as a party not long after the resolution was introduced to the Senate. The release states that the leakage should not be tolerated, and claims that the leaker is "undoubtedly" a "left-wing law clerk who's upset at the court's directive" Jonathan Spencer, former republican senator and current chairman of the SAGOP, expanded upon the press releases' claims when asked for a comment. He stated that he believes the intent of the leak was to "put pressure" on the justices to "sway" their votes. Likewise, he also claims that the leak was orchestrated by a "left-wing group." As of May the 14th, the identity of the leaker is still unknown. Sen. Rossi reaffirmed their party's beliefs in a brief interview with LSDN, where he stated that he was "shocked and deeply disappointed" in the culprit. Sen. Rossi connects the leak towards the protests, "calls to arms" across the nation - specifically noting Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot's tweet - and alleged threats towards the Supreme Court Justices. The "Call to Arms" in question, tweeted by Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot on May the 10th. Sen. Rossi also told the Daily that there are plans by the SAGOP to introduce a bill related to women's abortion rights if Roe vs. Wade were to be repealed, however he was not at liberty to say what the bill would entail. The SAGOP Chairman Spence likewise refused to comment on key details to what this bill may include, telling the Daily News that it was still in it's draft. However, he did note that the bill's draft includes "bipartisan points" with the expressed goal of making it "as fair as possible to men and women across San Andreas". When Sen. Rossi was questioned on his views on a woman's access to abortion clinics, he stated women should be permitted access to abortion clinics under "right and lawful circumstances". The SAGOP chairman Spencer however took a more hard-line stance where he told the Daily News of his belief that abortion is "murder". Describing themselves as a Christian, they note how in the bible a child is recognized upon conception, as said in Jeremiah 1:15. and that the bible doesn't distinguish between an unborn fetus and an infant. He also explained how the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 recognizes fetuses as human beings and grants them personhood in the eyes of the law. Under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004, if a fetus were to be killed due to an act of violence against the mother, the culprit would be charged with the death as if they killed a person. The Unborn Victims of Violence Act contains provisions that specifically exclude abortions from it's rulings, where neither the mother nor the medical practitioner can be charged for choosing to abort the baby. However, if Roe vs. Wade were to be repealed, the Senate and Congress would be free to be amended the bill to remove these provisions. If Roe vs. Wade is reversed, then abortion clinics will continue to be permitted to operate and provide services in Los Santos and throughout San Andreas, providing no legislation changes that. Women would also be free to seek out legal methods of abortion throughout the state. If the possible repeal of Planned Parenthood vs. Casey's ruling goes through too, there would be no requirement of the state, clinics nor cities to ensure there isn't an "undue burden" in seeking abortions. This means that women, while legally having access to abortions, may find the process harder or more costly. This could be due to new laws brought forth in the senate or changes in policies at medical clinics. Minority Leader Diana Jones declined to comment, saying that they will be expressing their views on the matter during the next senate hearing; it is scheduled to take place next week. They have expressed their interest in sharing their thoughts and answering questions after the hearing. The Los Santos Daily News is awaiting further comments from a number of Democrat Senators who have also stated that they are interested in sharing their thoughts and beliefs with us. Comments are enabled: Username: Comment: ((all mother that is holy i want bbcode))

THE RANA REPORT Your source for the latest Los Santos news, investigative journalism, and city-wide updates. Former LS COO Charles Lockhart confirmed as State Attorney General BY RANA KHATI Alta City Hall. On Wednesday, January 20th, 2021, the Senate Public Safety and State Security Committee convened for the confirmation hearing of Mr. Charles Lockhart for Attorney General. Mr. Lockhart was most recently the City Operations Officer for the greater Los Santos area. Throughout the hearing, Mr. Lockhart clarified and espoused his approach to criminal justice. He indicated that with regard to the death penalty that it should only be used only as a “last case resort” reserved for acts of mass murder or terrorism but ultimately should remain an option for those cases. With regard to organized crime, he expressed that there is a lack of manpower with regard to both the LSPD and LSSD task forces and indicated his office would attempt to increase support in this regard, whether that means a recruitment drive or seeking out of city transfers is unclear. Senator Ernst pressed Mr. Lockhart on what his office might do to tackle fraudulent charities, Mr. Lockhart referred back to his previous answer of ‘increasing resources’ to the relevant departments. With regard to the recent corruption blowout from Former Mayor Oswald Halford, Senator Burris asked him if there was anything that can be done to prevent this situation from ever happening again. Mr. Lockhart simply stated that as Mr. Halford was caught and prosecuted, “there isn’t much more that can be done when the system worked” Senator Burris pressed him and challenged the idea that the system worked with regard to the corruption and Mr. Lockhart’s reply was that “nobody knew of these allegations prior to him taking office” and then remarked as if Senator Burris was calling for a global surveillance of citizens home, office, and vehicles. Senator Burris has made no such proposal at any point during the hearing. On marijuana criminalization, Mr. Lockhart expressed that there are too many resources going towards the policing of marijuana that could be better expended in other areas of criminal justice which shows a willingness for his office to pursue a more lenient policy towards marijuana offenders. Mr. Lockhart was confirmed with a majority vote of four Yeas, those voting in the affirmative being Senator Frank Ernst, Senator Ethan Schmidt, Senator Gabriela Morales, and Senator Dwight Burris. Senator Gabriela Morales leaving the confirmation hearing. Senator Gabriela Morales, a prominent member of the city and state Democratic Party offered her comments after the hearing: When asked about the recent civil unrest with regard to former Mayor Halford’s corruption scandal, Senator Morales offered words of encouragement: UPDATED January 21, 2021: Lockhart in the Hearing - Taken by Ms. Nayeli Greyfeather @Greyfeather Thank you for supporting independent journalism Remember to like and subscribe for more city-wide news! > Comments are enabled

THE RANA REPORT Your source for the latest Los Santos news, investigative journalism, and city-wide updates. State Senate unanimously clears Marijuana Decrim to move to a final floor vote. BY RANA KHATI State Senate Hearing on Marijuana Legalization On Sunday January 24th, 2021, the San Andreas State Senate Public Safety and Security Committee convened to debate a resolution calling for the decriminalization of the use and sale of marijuana throughout Los Santos and San Andreas. Senator Dan Cardenas (R) chaired the debate and present for questioning was Dr. Danielle Shaw of Pillbox Hill Medical Center, Sheriff Dale Kelly of the Los Santos Sheriff's Department, LSSD Captain Isabella Ramirez, Unit Captain of Twin Towers Correctional Facility and LSSD Civilian Administrator Jameela Calvin. Activists came out in support of the measure in favor of decriminalization as well as with hesitation towards some of the senators: Baba Black, 44, a "Right to Blaze" activist: “Republican(s) lie… [regarding] herb. I think.. Republican will make a big lie and stop legalization.” Rana Khati: Would you be surprised if they supported it at the end of the debate? BB: “Ja, mon, but they are heavy into.. greed 'n de poison world.” (Quotes rendered from West Indian patois.). Prior to the debate, Senator Dwight Burris (D) shared his expectations regarding how it might go: Senator Burris: I'm expecting us to get this over with, we have a lot more on our plate, weed should have been legal a long time ago. If you see anybody making a fuss, it's clear cut party politics, I'm expecting my colleagues to use common sense. Senator Ethan Schmidt (R) provided an optimistic viewpoint prior to the hearing: RK: I wanted to get your impressions beforehand. Whether you have an open mind to the idea or not. Senator Schmidt: I do have an open mind to the idea, any idea. I think that's what democracy is about. Senator Dan Cardenas chaired the historic hearing and ensured an orderly and time efficient proceeding, he operated with impartiality as chairman and assigned and enforced time evenly across the board. He afforded time in the beginning to opening statements from those invited which are reproduced below. Dr. Danielle Shaw & Captain Isabella Ramirez opening statements on behalf of Pillbox Hill & the LSSD respectively Opening statement of Dr. Danielle Shaw of Pillbox Hill Medical Center: Opening statement of Captain Isabella Ramirez, Unit Commander of the LSSD Twin Tower Correctional Facility: Sen. Gabriela Morales (D), unfortunately photographed nearby a trash-can during her opening statement. Senator Gabriela Morales (D) is the primary sponsor of the resolution, which ultimately calls on the Senate to convene on a vote to a final bill that addresses the core issue- the decriminalization of marijuana use and distribution throughout the state. While largely seen as a symbolic vote to prioritize a hot-button issue, Senator Morales's floor time was sharply focused on inquiring about the potential positive effects of such decriminalization: DC: Senator Morales is recognized for 5 minutes. Senator Morales: Sheriff Kelly, Captain Ramirez, Doctor Shaw, thank you for your statements today, I'm sure many in the audience watched on with happiness at hearing your candidness. Legalizing marijuana is at the forefront of the Democratic agenda, but I hope that we can move this resolution beyond party lines, so again, thank you. I'd like to just ask, Doctor Shaw, whether you have statistics or even anecdotal knowledge of health complications at PHMC (Pillbox Hill Medical Center) in regards to consumption of cannabis? DC: I am yet to see such a case Senator, its far more like we'd encounter issues with other prescription medication like Oxycodone. The worst you'll get from Marijuana is a hungry stomach and feel a bit sleepy. GM: Thank you, Doctor Shaw, can I ask a further question, is it likely you would prescribe marijuana, or cannabis, to treat certain aliments in accordance with scientific evidence? DS: Correct, there are many conditions which would benefit from Marijuana. To list a few, Parkinsons, Anxiety, HIV or AIDS, or even as a pain relief in cases of severe trauma. GM: And therefore, do you believe that it is beneficial, from a healthcare standpoint, to have cannabis as a valid option for medical and recreational use? DS: I do. Senator Frank Ernst (R) challenges the issue, questioning those called to the hearing. The most critical of the resolution in it's current form, Senator Frank Ernst (R) used his floor time to question the Law Enforcement witnesses on potential drawbacks of decriminalization from a criminal justice standpoint. The debate was tense between the Senator and the Sheriff, but became contentious particularly with interjections from LSSD Civilian Administrator Jameela Calvin and Dr. Danielle Shaw. Senator Frank Ernst's questioning: Senator Ethan Schmidt (R) and Senator Frank Ernst (R) seated at the Republican side of the dais. Senator Ethan Schmidt (R) offered a brief line of questioning with regard to the witnesses stances on the various categories of legalization and medical use-cases: Senator Ethan Schmidt: I have a question for all three of the witnesses. If we are to separate medical usage of marijuana, decriminalization of marijuana, and recreational use of marijuana into three different categories. Which categories would you support, not support, or remain neutral on? DK: To start off, I do believe of marijuana for medicinal reasons should be left to medical professionals. They probably know whether it is safe to do better than I ever will. As such, I won't be commenting on medicinal use. Decriminalizing the use of marijuana, thus making sure the users are not treated as criminals has my support however. I believe Captain Ramirez has already shed some light into why that may be. I have no comments on recreational use, however. DS: Senator, if I may. I'd be in strong support for its medical use, as well as decriminalizing it. I'm also in support of recreational. ES: Thank you. One more question. Marijuana is currently decriminalized under 15 grams. Under what use case would more than fifteen grams be necessary for medical usage? DS: Senator, such quantities would be akin to allowing patients to not make frequent trips to the hospital. Same type of scenario goes to if we allow them to grow their own plants. It helps reduce the workload on my staff for such prescriptions ES: Thank you, I yield the rest of my time to the chair. Senator Dan Cardenas (R) offered his own line of questioning: Senator Dan Cardenas: Sheriff Kelly. Are you in favor of legalizing marijuana distribution... and giving people the power to wholesale marijuana? My question extends to the Sheriff's deputies as well. DK: I'm neutral on the matter. DC: Thank you. I extend the same question to Ms. Shaw. To repeat, are you in favor of legalizing marijuana distribution and giving people the power to wholesale marijuana? DS: I am Senator, provided provisions are made to ensure correct taxation, regulation to ensure its sold to those of age, and general safeguards akin to that of alcohol distribution. With those accounted for yes, otherwise, no. DC: Correct taxation, as in... tax which would effectively fall on distributors? DS: Correct. DC: Thank you. I don't believe in new taxes, but OK ... so you say we should raise taxes on small business, dispensaries and even individual growers? DS: I'm saying, if you'll allow me, to introduce a small tax like we do on alcohol sales, which can be used to generate income in support of communities, to use against tackling real crime or healthcare from its aftermath. DC: Essentially sales tax for marijuana. I see. My time has expired. LSSD Sheriff Dale Kelly answering questions. The Senate voted unanimously, all six senators voting yea to move the resolution to a final floor vote when a full bill is presented. The Democratic Senators were naturally elated regarding the results. The Rana Report got the impressions from the Republican Senators to get their view of how the hearing went and how they wish to move forward on the pressing issue. Rana Khati: Did todays session adequately ease any of your concerns regarding this resolution's decriminalization of marijuana? Senator Ernst: This resolution is a non-binding procedure that simply expresses a sense of the Senate. It's unknown to me why Ms. Morales didn't draft an actual bill to present to the Senate. As soon as I see an actual bill discussed, you'll know my exact thoughts. RK: Did the information from Dr. Shaw or Kelly inform you more greatly? Was this a productive use of your time? Senator Cardenas: Yes indeed. I feel it's important that we hear from our law enforcement on the matter. They're the ones on the street actually keeping citizens accountable. We learned that the police don't even charge for marijuana unless it comes along with additional charges. Now whether these arrests make it to court... that's a question for the district attorney. RK: And did this ease any of your concerns with regard to the proposed resolution, potential amendments nonwithstanding? DC: I believe so, yeah. It seems like we're not enforcing this anyway— why should it be there, right? But I don't want my name on saying that we should strike all notions of cannabis and marijuana from the penal code. Not without proper legislation. RK: Do you know whether your constituents are in favor any form of Marijuana decriminalization initiative by the Senate? FE: Polling indicates that this is a popular issue, sure. But, it's on us as public servant to ensure that any form of decriminalization and legalization doesn't harm the public, our children, or our economy. DC: I know Central wants to see marijuana legalization. We all heard Dr. Shaw today and Dr. Shaw and her hospital are exactly in my district. I can't overlook the sensational... nature of the issue. Indeed. I support Frank in his statement here. RK: Senator Schmidt, did todays hearing resolve any questions you may have had regarding this issue? Senator Schmidt: It sure did. I believe we've set the right foundation to look into fully legalizing marijuana. The people of Blaine County have made it clear they are in favor of legalization, therefore I am obligated to fulfill it. But as Frank said, as public servants, we must make sure it is done through thorough deliberation. FE: Which is precisely why I took issue with some of the language in the resolution. How can we make commitments if we don't even know what an outline of the marijuana bill looks like? RK: Do you believe your colleagues across the aisle are providing this level of due diligence? ES: I believe my colleagues across the isle should've proposed a bill with specifics on how they wish to carry out legalization. Which authorities get delegated licensing. And everything else which needs to be discussed. FE: Again, I'm not sure why Morales proposed a resolution, but I'm sure it's because she wants to look like she's doing something on the issue without actually proposing something concrete. RK: Thank you for your time Senators. The Rana Report has reached out to the office of Senator Morales regarding the insinuations on her motives in bringing the resolution to the floor and we are currently awaiting a response. The article will be updated when we receive one. All in all, activists elated as they left the courtroom; the sense that the government was actively listening to the will of the people was undeniable. We caught up with Baba Black, the activist we spoke to prior to the debate: Rana Khati: So before the hearing you stated you thought the republicans might vote against. How do you feel about the result... an unanimous motion for this to proceed... with the republicans [Yea] vote? Baba Black: Ja, mon. I think dem Republican hide dey rasism nao, seen? Dem wanna be I and I savior nao widde Biden adminis-tray-shun 'n ting, seen? Dey wanna be moa moderate widdey policy. RK: Do you think they will vote yea on the final bill? BB: I no-no. Dem sneks inna grass, yano. We also spoke with Ms. Nora Patterson, the Curator of Culture Los Santos City Government RK: Are you able to give your impressions of today's events? Nora Patterson: Well. It's nice to see that they have opened the floodgates regarding marijuana use. I fully agree on the legalization of marijuana. It's silly of them to keep it illegal for any longer. The Rana Report will continue to update the public regarding the fate of marijuana decriminalization legislation throughout the State of San Andreas and the city of Los Santos. Remember to like and subscribe for more city-wide news! Thank you for supporting independent news!

THE RANA REPORT Your source for the latest Los Santos news, investigative journalism, and city-wide updates. INTERVIEW: LSFD Junior Journalist Edgars Gudlevskis kicks off campaign for state office BY RANA KHATI Edgar Gudlevskis (R) The airwaves have no shortage of offers, deals, and sparkling advertisements, but Edgars Gudlevskis is the only candidate for an as-yet-undetermined State office who has begun to sell his campaign in the early month of January. With six months until the elections, Los Santans will undoubtedly see a chorus line of candidates dance before them in the months to come and the Rana Report will endeavor to interview each and every one of them with the thoroughness you might expect from a job interview- after all, they are vying for the most important job in representing the public interest. We sat with Mr. Gudlevskis in at The Rotten Apple bar in Strawberry for a beer and a quick interview on his campaign, his political goals, and his background. RK: Let's start off with the basics. What's your name, age, and the office you are running for? EG: Edgars Gudlevskis. I'm 27. I've filed paperwork to represent the Republicans in the upcoming election. I expect to run for a Senate District position, possibly Blaine County. We're also looking at the Mayor Election situation, but we're not too sure on that yet. RK: When you say "We" are you speaking about the city-wide Republican party or you and your team? EG: Well, I've filed as a Republican, but I don't believe in party labels. I'm more of an independent with policies that focus on freedom. That can be seen on my campaign website. RK: Okay so you don't have particular coordination with the local Republican officials just yet? EG: The initial paperwork has been filed. I've been in contact with party officials about my plans. We're moving forward right now, so far so good. RK: Mr. Joseph Hoffman is the Republican City Council District Representative for Blaine County. Is he someone that you've worked with in the past? Do you have any opinion on how his work has been as a District Representative? EG: I'm not a fan of any of the Senate District Representatives [sic], that's partially why I'm so passionate about running. I support the Republicans slightly more than the Democrats, but it's really just a formality. RK: Let's talk about your past. How long have you lived in Los Santos, what has your job history been like, and how has it made you the perfect candidate? EG: Well. The people will be glad to hear that I love to fight for them. I've been here for a little while, not too long, but I love this city and its citizens. I have volunteered at many local businesses, including the Grand Casino in Rockford. I also have a connection with the Los Santos Fire Department in their Public Relations division. EG shows RK a badge issued by the Los Santos Fire Department denoting him as a Junior Journalist. They serve the people. That's why I associate myself with them. I want to serve the people as well. RK: Recently the Senate convened to nominate former City Operations Officer Charles Lockhart to be Attorney General. In his hearing, he was asked about the recent corruption scandal from former Mayor Oswald Halford. He was asked whether he thought anything could be done to have stopped the corruption before it happened. He said "the system worked" [and implied] that there was nothing really that could have been done. Do you agree with this or do you have a plan to make our elections less prone to this sort of corruption? EG: I must say that I think there are things that we can do. RK: What would some of those be? EG: What that is... It's going to be tough to really look at those changes. But I think we need a system centered around people, transparency, and freedom. Freedom is my major platform. I reiterate this over and over and over… It's stamped all over my website too. But I want freedom. Elections need to be free and fair. People need to have faith in the system and I'm going to fight to make that happen. RK: In the Senate, if you are elected you will have the power to write and propose legislation. Do you have any experience in writing legislation in your personal history? EG: Writing legislation is important. I went to the University of Latvia and earned a degree in Economics. I would focus a lot of my legislation on the Economy, but also on freedom. I want gas prices to be lower for the Trucking and Taxi Cab industries. So I need to take a look at supply and demand. I think the Senate also needs to look at supporting the farmers. One way we can do that is to provide them with grants and ensure that their crops remain valuable in our markets. RK: I'm seeing freedom is a big theme. Can you give me your positions on the following hot-button issues: The Housing Shortage, Marijuana Criminalization, LGBT Rights, and Second Amendment Rights? EG: Marijuana should be legal. LGBT will have equal rights, I am fighting to protect and 'EXPAND' the Second Amendment. Three very important... issues. I'm very clear. Legal. Equal. Protect. RK: Do you have a plan for expanding housing so people are not living out of hotels? In Blaine, the housing shortage has people living in the city who work in the County. EG: Expanding housing, well there's pros and cons to that issue. At the same time, I've lived in a Motel and I loved it. So I'm looking at that carefully, but I really think I'm pretty neutral on that issue. I'd probably vote to expand housing due to the shortage. I'd love to hear more about it from the people. RK: Public housing you mean? EG: Er. Yes. Look. I've been around all of the districts. I've been in restaurants, bars, gas stations, all of it. The people are starting a movement behind Edgars. Behind... me... You know? That's important. People are going to be shocked real soon. RK: You, like so many Los Santos citizens, are someone who made Los Santos their home but still have a culture from another place. I am like this too. How does your Latvian culture inspire you to be a better Los Santan? EG: Well. I love my home country of Latvia, but it had its problems. So does Los Santos. One thing that I've learned about being here in Los Santos is that I love working with the people. I love farmers, fishermen, bartenders, dealers at the casino, citizens, police, firemen. I think we can find unity in that because we're all the same. Our backgrounds may be different but we're all from Los Santos, we're all living here. We need to work together to make it better, and even though I'm from Latvia, I'm fighting for them regardless. For more information about Mr. Gudlevskis and his campaign, you can find his website linked here. Are you part of the movement, do you have questions for Mr. Gudlevskis? Sound off in the comment section below and have your voice heard! Remember to like and subscribe for more city-wide news! Thank you for supporting independent journalism > Comments are enabled

Hey everybody. We're still figuring out how these clubs work but I figure I'd post the first topic. Straight to the point, what are some things you'd like to see out of the government on this server?