Jump to content

denybosnia

Partner
  • Posts

    326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by denybosnia

  1. 1 minute ago, debla az zanm said:


    Well then, let me question you a bit, Eunmi. Were you on, on Monday, ‎March ‎18, ‎2024, at ‏‎6:39:26 PM, around the arcade? Tell the truth, as well because I have the proof already on deck, just wanting to see if you'd lie or not.

     

    Hello once again, I will answer questions provided by admin himself, which I advise you to do as well, since admin is handling the report, not you and me. Cheers

    • Upvote 1
    • Applaud 2
  2. 12 minutes ago, debla az zanm said:


     

    You were all identified off / from your affiliates. Each and every car we saw scouting the turf, slid in, and etc. were infront of your turf at the time being. In which weren't the first and only time we spotted the same vehicles in the area. Appropriate action was token swiftly, and you were neutralized for being easily identified as apart of the faction. Besides, in this area of Los Santos "Locals" aren't a common thing, if you hang in the area, you're from the area. Also, my identification wasn't very poor, considering you indeed ended up being apart of the faction!
     

    Accusation 3: I wasn't alone. The attack consisted of me, and Matias, which admins can confirm.
     

    Last accusation: There's not really much to say here, when you enter / exit a door, players, and items alike take a while to load in. I shot at the first person I seen which was you, and then secondly Eunmi. Here's the thing though, there was no "flicker" you're both sitting afk, in animations, not paying attention to your surroundings. I shot the person farther away firstly, then turned to the person right beside me and killed them. If "hitbox" was used, then Jang would've most definitely got caught in the cross fire, while I was shooting you. 

    https://streamable.com/z8zg7o
    https://streamable.com/2asgid
    https://streamable.com/b31ffy

     

    Hello, thank you very much for your response, however I'd like to outline following facts

     

    • Eunmi was not involved in any attack by now, nor her vehicle was ever at some shooting
    • On the moment when you came, my car was not even spawned in-game
    • @Thekillergreece I still see no proof here on how Eunmi and Miyo were IDed from them since we were barely included in this war
    • Your identification was indeed poor, because as you said yourself "ended up being a part of the faction", sounds like you killed first, then waited to see if we're part of the faction.

     

    This also is not your first time that you fail to identify target properly.

     

     

    @Thekillergreecelet me know please if any additional info is needed from me or Miyo, to highlight I still don't see video from him, his POV of shooting which should be standard since he's faction leader and participant in the war. These videos from God knows when, don't prove anything.

    • Upvote 3
    • Applaud 2
  3. Date and Time of incident: 23.03.2024 at 2:11 server time

    Names of witnesses (if applicable): Miyo Akira

    Your ingame name: Eunmi Jang

    Overall Explanation (250 word limit) : Javier walked out of our HQ with a mask on, and just shot me and Miyo, ok, our factions are in the war, but we believe that he did not have enough to ID me or Miyo, and also walking by himself into opposed faction HQ is a bit unrealistic.

     

     

    Accusation 1 (50 words): He MGed Eunmi and Miyo without any concrete proof  

    Reported Player(s) Who Broke it: Javier Contreras

    Reported Players(s) Faction (if any): Diablos

    Evidence:

    Spoiler

    FB1HAsn.png
    9qHycTm.png

     

    Accusation 2 (50 words): ROE rules, Javier killed Eunmi and Miyo only because they were standing in war zone, not because he put up work to ID them

    Reported Player(s) Who Broke it: Javier Contreras

    Reported Players(s) Faction (if any): Diablos

    Evidence: https://streamable.com/bh6q6m

     

    Accusation 3 (50 words): Going alone into the opposed faction HQ, with only a gun on you is unrealistic, especially in the middle of the war.

    Reported Player(s) Who Broke it: Javier Contreras

    Reported Players(s) Faction (if any): Diablos

    Evidence: Video above

    Accusation 4 (50 words): I also want admin to take a look at how Javier flickered here, aiming 3rd person who was not killed, then switching to Miyo and me, this is not a natural aim as well, most likely cheat, I'd ask him to provide his video as well, but as usual he'll say he didn't record one. In 1 second he went from looking at the wall, to aiming DV (3rd party who was not killed) and then shooting Miyo in the head. We can also see his bullets passing by Eunmi, and I still got damaged, cause of extended hitbox.
    Rule broken : 7

    Report Player(s) Who Broke it : Javier Contreras

    Report Player(s) Faction (if any): Diablos

    Evidence : https://streamable.com/oo6pqy
    Extended hitbox - https://streamable.com/g70vog

    • Upvote 7
    • Applaud 2
  4. Hello, Eunmi Jang here, I will start from the beginning

     

    The reporting party walked into my car (which was turned on) while I was afk (that's on me as I wrote on /cb sry, and I continued to rp) and he pointed a gun at Eunmi, at LT turf, who is a high-rank character in the illegal faction.

     

    His first line of /me was subpar and not really understandable since he didn't clarify how exactly would Eunmi be frisked, but just "feels throughout her figure". IF they were on the street, it would be ok, but he was in her car after all, which would realistically require him to move over the seat, in order to frisk her. Upon my questions on /do to be more precise how Eunmi would be searched, I didn't get a clear answer. 

    Spoiler

    [04:01:32] * Mask_CC675_40 begins to feels all throughout her figure, looking for anything that could be value.
    [04:01:58] * Would Mask go trough her whole body? (( Eunmi Jang ))*
    [04:02:24] * He would try his best searching any notable places that value items could be held, still keeping the weapon against her dome. (( Mask_CC675_40 ))*
    [04:02:35] * What places would mask search at? (( Eunmi Jang ))*
    [04:03:19] Isiah Ando says: Heyo Eun!
    [04:03:38] * Would search through her upper-garment, he taps onto his leggings, along with his pocket that's in her upper-garment. (( Mask_CC675_40 ))*


    He wrote with his /me that he would tap onto her leggings, and upon his question where would gun be located I answered with the following, and he claimed he searched that part, even tho he just tapped the leggings.

    Spoiler

    * Behind her back, tucked into sweatpants where mask didn't check. (( Eunmi Jang ))*
    [04:04:34] * Where the Glock be located where I searched? (( Mask_CC675_40 ))*
    [04:05:01] * Has checked her LEGGINGS, would that count as her sweatpants? (( Mask_CC675_40 ))*

     

    I also want to highlight that the whole RP was rushed, which is proved by the reporting party doing /rob 3 times in span of 5 minutes.

    Spoiler

    [04:03:46] You're being robbed, use /arob  to show your inventory to Mask_CC675_40 once their roleplay is done. If you feel the robbery is extremely poor roleplayed, feel free to /report now but make sure to continue the roleplay.
    [04:04:20] You're being robbed, use /arob  to show your inventory to Mask_CC675_40 once their roleplay is done. If you feel the robbery is extremely poor roleplayed, feel free to /report now but make sure to continue the roleplay.
    [04:05:07] You're being robbed, use /arob  to show your inventory to Mask_CC675_40 once their roleplay is done. If you feel the robbery is extremely poor roleplayed, feel free to /report now but make sure to continue the roleplay.

     

    Now we come to the key part, where the reporting party actually PGed, he was frisking Eunmi, keeping an eye on Isiah who was nearby (visible in his video), and pointing a gun at Eun, all at the same time, how?

    Now we come to the part, where he found the gun.. somehow, without specifying that he's leaning over the seat, or that he's searching at the exact place where I specified the gun to be.

    Spoiler

    * Mask_CC675_40 comes across the Glock while searching through the leggings, wasting no time to snatch ahold of it.

     

    Here is the position of Eunmi and Mask in the car

    Spoiler

    LioKsBm.png


    So, logically if he tried to snatch her gun, he would have to reach behind Eunmi, where the gun was located, tucked into her sweatpants, behind her back. So, while he was doing that Eunmi decided to step on the gas, and hit into nearby tree to stun the Mask, and of course, she got out and started to shoot him, since he said he would blow her brains out, and held a gun on her head, so DM accusation is not valid.

     

    The way I see it, the reporting party was in a rush to finish the whole robbery, not even giving me a chance to respond, spamming /rob 3 times, and doing subpar line

    * Mask_CC675_40 comes across the Glock while searching through the leggings, wasting no time to snatch ahold of it. 

    I clearly specified the location of the gun, which was not in her leggings but tucked behind her back.

    To summarize, the reporting party failed at the following : 

    • Failed to specify frisk locations, was just subpar /me ( * Mask_CC675_40 begins to feels all throughout her figure, looking for anything that could be value.)
    • No fear RP, he knew where he was, once Isiah showed up, clearly seeing Mask holding a gun onto Eunmi, all he did was /me keeps eye on Isiah
    • The line * Mask_CC675_40 comes across the Glock while searching through the leggings, wasting no time to snatch ahold of it, doesn't mean that he snatched her gun, but as I've said he would have to lean over the whole car to take it, where Eunmi, a person who was in this kind of situations before, used the opportunity to smack into the tree and attempt to kill him, which she succeeded. DM accusation simply doesn't make sense.
    • I don't believe PG occurred from my side since Eunmi killed people before, and with Isiah being there, Eunmi just took her chance to surprise the robber, while he was reaching for her gun, which is located on her back.
    • I believe PG rule is pretty clear in these situations, there was no need to rush anything and do 3 /robs in less than 2 minutes and also he never specified with /me that he was reaching for the gun behind her back, but tapping her leggins instead, but anyway he should've stopped searching after first /rob according to the rule :
      Quote

      Victims of a robbery are expected to roleplay what their robber would find based on the descriptions of the search performed on them accordingly. Only at the end of the roleplay surrounding the robbery, once the robber is done with roleplaying taking what they can take and finished with the presented search, is when the victim must /showitems upon request of the robber. 

       

    • @Jolaghlet me know if some video is needed from my side since the reporting party uploaded the whole video.

     

     

    Edit : apologies for long reply, but also robbing rules state the following : 
    finWQ0p.png

     

    "You've travelled miles away from you character's residential anchor to mug someone,

     

    According to his story, his character is living in Rancho, so what was he doing in Little Seoul?

     

  5. Pj7ndyD.png
    ifas9EM.png


    5T7861p.png

     

    SAFETY MEASURES IMPLEMENTED IN ROCKFORD MALL TUNNEL

     

    Written by Tiana Reeves, 12th of March, 2024


     

    o9ZDmn2.png

    (Pictured Above: Entry to the tunnel from Alta St.) 

     

    The Rockford Mall in Burton has long been a popular spot for shoppers and visitors alike. With new businesses being opened, what it seems to be every day now, the mall is getting more and more visitors every day. A variety of stores such as clothes stores, jewelry, music equipment stores, and fast food the mall is quickly becoming a popular place in the city. 

    However, a particular area of the mall has always been problematic—the tunnel. For years, this tunnel has been the place of numerous accidents and near-misses, often causing drivers to argue if the road is a one-way road, or not. Finally, this should come to an end as safety measures have been implemented to regulate traffic flow and prevent further incidents.

     

    After years of accidents, arguments, and physical altercations, the authorities have taken action. The installation of clear signage indicating the tunnel as a one-way street is a huge step towards enhancing safety. Now, drivers entering the tunnel can't unsee the directives, reducing the likelihood of head-on collisions and confusion.

     

    qoODkkb.png

    (Pictured Above: The tunnel exit which served as an entry to people driving in the wrong lane.)

     

    Additionally, barriers have been placed to enforce the one-way rule and prevent drivers of going the wrong way. These barriers not only increase safety but also provide pedestrians with a lot more safety and confidence, that in case they decide to walk to the other side of the street, they will not be run over by someone attempting to drive in the wrong direction.

     

    According to our investigation, the main cause of accidents, and people driving the wrong way was a popular navigation app that majority of people were using, which was actually leading the drivers to go trough the tunnel driving in the wrong way. We have tried to get in contact with the publishing studio, that posted the app, but we were not able to get a statement.

     

    l1paEoY.png

    (Pictured Above: Clear barriers and "one-way" sign have been implemented.)

     


    One thing that remains a mystery is, who actually gave the work order from the authorities. In any case, we're happy that citizens of Los Santos now will be able to drive through this tunnel peacefully, without having to worry that a vehicle will come from the opposite direction, and cause a head-on collision. 


    EFKRk45.png

    3eFjN46.jpg

    Gxg72Wo.gif


     

    Comments Are: Enabled


     

    Name:

    Comment:

     

     

    • Upvote 8
  6. cNbmXHP.png

     

    Darnell was shocked by the speed of resolving a request, while Latifah was answering a question if there are better servers than GTAW

  7. On 2/6/2024 at 2:47 PM, Bellagio said:

    I have notified both players again and will be giving them 24h additional to state their side as much of the evidence is still unclear, without a response in 24h I’ll be concluding this based on the evidence provided and the time this report has been up for

    Kindly reminder 

×
×
  • Create New...