Jump to content

Los Santos Daily News

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited



Personal Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 160,000 edit: aw fuck wrong forum account w/e cba reporting. offer still standing
  2. Advertising with the Los Santos Daily News The Los Santos Daily News is one of the biggest up and coming online and print newspapers in the Los Santos County. Our website gets hundreds upon thousands of clicks a day, and each article will get on average hundreds, occasionally thousands, of clicks localized in the Los Santos County area in 24 hours. The going rate for our advertising space is $10,000 per week, with an offer for 6 weeks being $50,000. Each banner ad you wish to purchase will be a separate contract. Therefore, if you plan to advertise for two businesses using two different banners, then you would be paying $20,000 a week. Or if you wish to advertise for one business using two banner adverts, that will cost $20,000 a week. Until June 1st, 2022, there will be a life time deal where your business will permanently be advertised on this site at the cost of $300,000. To place an advert with the Los Santos Daily News, please fill out the following form and email it to [email protected] Name: Phone Number: Email Address: Company Name: Company Phone Number: Company Address: (online businesses may write N/A) Company Email Address: Nature of Company: (Explain your business in two sentences max.) Role within company: Confirm whether or not that you are authorized to act on behalf of the company written above: (Y/N) Amount of weeks: Amount of adverts you wish to purchase: I fully intend to provide my own banner ads: (Y/N) If yes, the Banner Ad(s): (Please ensure your advert is roughly 4:1 aspect ratio, following this.) If no, I understand that having the LSDN create an advert will incur an additional fee of $25,000: Please provide details: (Colour scheme, mottos, etc. The LSDN will try to accommodate what we can for your advert) Advert Domain Name: (Where does the adverts go? Try to include a link, even if it is just a Facebrowser page) I have read and confirmed the terms and conditions at the bottom of the page: (Y/N) Signed: We require at least one method of contact, whether it be by mail, phone number or email address. Inability to provide a single method to contact you by will mark your application as null and void. Terms and conditions: ((the adverts on articles and main threads will always link to the post below, no matter what they show. the post below will be a list of ads present on LSDN, which will link you to the business/destination of your choosing.))
  3. Username: Y. Delgado-Flores Comment: Thank you @ARossi! It was a rather hectic night, so I didn't get the chance to proof read as much as I would have liked.
  4. NEWS • Crime Written by Yunisa DELGADO-FLORES • May 15th, 2022 Man found shot dead in Del Porro parking lot, suspects at large A body was found late last night in a parking lot overlooking Vespucci beach with seven gunshot wounds, multiple directed at their head. The body, discovered by someone who wished to remain anonymous On May the 15th, early in the morning, a body was discovered by a pedestrian in a Del Porro parking lot off of Bay City Avenue on their way home from work. "I was making my way home from work, and I thought I saw a man laying on the concrete.", the witness said, who wished to keep their identity a secret. "Usually- I wouldn't mind. There's a lot of drunks in this city, you know? It's not uncommon to see someone passed out on a Saturday night. But something was rubbing me the wrong way." "I turned to pull into the parking lot and the headlights shown the blood." The witness then proceeded to call the police who, after five minutes, proceeded to investigate the scene. The medical examiners office state that the victim suffered a total of seven gunshot wounds from 9mm rounds; five of which were directed at his head. The exact details of the shooting remains unknown, including the number of shooters, suspects, and motive. However, experts suspect that this is a gangland-style execution due to the manner of injuries sustained. There are currently no known suspects behind this murder. If anyone has any information as to the identity of the victim or the shooters, they are encouraged to reach out to the Daily News and the Los Santos Police Department. Comments are enabled: Username: Comment: (())
  5. NEWS • Crime Written by Yunisa DELGADO-FLORES • May 15th, 2022 Motorist killed in high speed pursuit, two arrested Late this night in Little Seoul, two men were arrested for evading a traffic stop; a chase that led to the death of one motorist. One of the suspects being chased. - Yunisa Delgado-Flores Click the left and right arrows to see more. ((album on next page)) On May the 15th, early in the morning, a tragic accident occurred in the middle of a high speed chase between four LSPD-marked cruisers and two unidentified males. A traffic stop initiated on Carson Avenue at approximately 2:50AM where, the two suspects - two males in their early 20s - fled in their Chino. Officers began chase and, through the use of a spike trap, disabled the vehicle by Adam's Apple Boulevard. According to an officer on scene, in the middle of the pursuit between the officers and the suspects, the two suspects slammed into a man driving his motorbike down the street. An EMT quickly came to the victim's aide, however he was pronounced dead on arrival. The victim remains unidentified. The chase ended in Little Seoul by Adam's Apple Boulevard, where the vehicle crashed against a divider. The two men sprinted out of the vehicle, where a foot pursuit began. One of the suspects fell not long after exiting the vehicle, while the other sprinted a few yards before being brought down by a tazer. One of the suspects is in critical, but stable, condition; EMTs arrived on scene shortly after their detainment to take them into their care. The other was taken away for booking. The identities of the suspects nor their motives for evading the traffic stop remain unknown to the Daily News. Comments are enabled: Username: Comment:
  6. NEWS • Politics Written by Yunisa DELGADO-FLORES • May 14th, 2022 Resolution to condemn Roe vs. Wade leaker enters the SA State Senate The SAGOP shares their theories as to the leaker's identity, as well as expressing their stance on abortion following the Roe vs. Wade leak The State Capitol building, May 13th, 2022 - Alan Kim. Resolution 28, a resolution seeing to condemn the leaker of the Roe vs. Wade opinion draft, was recently introduced to the State Senate by Senator Adrian Rossi (R). On May the 3rd, 2022 an opinion draft was leaked to the press regarding the overturning of the 1973 case Roe vs. Wade, a landmark case that secured a woman's right to access abortion clinics and treatments without government restrictions, as well as the 1993 case Planned Parenthood vs. Casey which disallowed states to place an "undue burden" on women seeking abortions. The draft, written by Justice Alito of the US Supreme Court, contains The removal of Roe vs. Wade would put a woman's right to abortion at risk across the nation. As it stands, there are 16 states that have the right to abortion enshrined in law, including the democrat-leaning states of Colorado, New Jersey and Illinois, and 14 states that have laws in place ready to restrict abortions following Roe vs. Wade's reversal, which include the republican-leaning states of Arkansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma. San Andreas, by the time this article has been released, has no law neither protecting a woman's access to abortion clinics nor any bill planning to restrict a woman's access to abortion treatments. An attempt to pass a bill enshrining a woman's right to access safe and legal abortions was introduced by former senator Edward Ulf (D) in 2021. The Women's Health Act of 2021 would have secured the right of medical clinics across San Andreas to legally conduct abortions, while also enabling and supporting a woman's choice to either abort or keep the fetus in the legislature. It would have enshrined the Roe vs. Wade ruling into the San Andreas Legislature. The Women's Health Act of 2021 failed to reach the floor. Sen. Rossi stated in an interview that the reason for this was due to other bills being "given priority", partially due to the ruling of Roe vs. Wade still standing. Resolution 28, named A Resolution to Condemn the U.S. Supreme Court Draft Leaker, was proposed by Sen. Rossi. The resolution claims that the leak was politically motivated and suggested it undermines the Justices' ability to act impartially. It calls for the leaker's immediate disbarment and removal from the US Supreme Court. The resolution also commends Justice John Roberts for a "swift response" in confirming the validity of the leak. On the day of the leak, Justice Roberts directed the court marshal to launch an investigation into the identity and source of the leak. If the resolution were to pass, the State Senate would officially condemn the leaker on the national stage. The San Andreas GOP made a press release condemning the leaker as a party not long after the resolution was introduced to the Senate. The release states that the leakage should not be tolerated, and claims that the leaker is "undoubtedly" a "left-wing law clerk who's upset at the court's directive" Jonathan Spencer, former republican senator and current chairman of the SAGOP, expanded upon the press releases' claims when asked for a comment. He stated that he believes the intent of the leak was to "put pressure" on the justices to "sway" their votes. Likewise, he also claims that the leak was orchestrated by a "left-wing group." As of May the 14th, the identity of the leaker is still unknown. Sen. Rossi reaffirmed their party's beliefs in a brief interview with LSDN, where he stated that he was "shocked and deeply disappointed" in the culprit. Sen. Rossi connects the leak towards the protests, "calls to arms" across the nation - specifically noting Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot's tweet - and alleged threats towards the Supreme Court Justices. The "Call to Arms" in question, tweeted by Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot on May the 10th. Sen. Rossi also told the Daily that there are plans by the SAGOP to introduce a bill related to women's abortion rights if Roe vs. Wade were to be repealed, however he was not at liberty to say what the bill would entail. The SAGOP Chairman Spence likewise refused to comment on key details to what this bill may include, telling the Daily News that it was still in it's draft. However, he did note that the bill's draft includes "bipartisan points" with the expressed goal of making it "as fair as possible to men and women across San Andreas". When Sen. Rossi was questioned on his views on a woman's access to abortion clinics, he stated women should be permitted access to abortion clinics under "right and lawful circumstances". The SAGOP chairman Spencer however took a more hard-line stance where he told the Daily News of his belief that abortion is "murder". Describing themselves as a Christian, they note how in the bible a child is recognized upon conception, as said in Jeremiah 1:15. and that the bible doesn't distinguish between an unborn fetus and an infant. He also explained how the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 recognizes fetuses as human beings and grants them personhood in the eyes of the law. Under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004, if a fetus were to be killed due to an act of violence against the mother, the culprit would be charged with the death as if they killed a person. The Unborn Victims of Violence Act contains provisions that specifically exclude abortions from it's rulings, where neither the mother nor the medical practitioner can be charged for choosing to abort the baby. However, if Roe vs. Wade were to be repealed, the Senate and Congress would be free to be amended the bill to remove these provisions. If Roe vs. Wade is reversed, then abortion clinics will continue to be permitted to operate and provide services in Los Santos and throughout San Andreas, providing no legislation changes that. Women would also be free to seek out legal methods of abortion throughout the state. If the possible repeal of Planned Parenthood vs. Casey's ruling goes through too, there would be no requirement of the state, clinics nor cities to ensure there isn't an "undue burden" in seeking abortions. This means that women, while legally having access to abortions, may find the process harder or more costly. This could be due to new laws brought forth in the senate or changes in policies at medical clinics. Minority Leader Diana Jones declined to comment, saying that they will be expressing their views on the matter during the next senate hearing; it is scheduled to take place next week. They have expressed their interest in sharing their thoughts and answering questions after the hearing. The Los Santos Daily News is awaiting further comments from a number of Democrat Senators who have also stated that they are interested in sharing their thoughts and beliefs with us. Comments are enabled: Username: Comment: ((all mother that is holy i want bbcode))
  • Create New...