-
Posts
739 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Noobie
-
-
-
Report concluded, this was handled in game.
The gun has returned. The player was punished for chain-robbing and breaking into cars in a no-crime zone. -
Handling.
-
-
-
-
No evidence was posted, you had plenty of time to do so. I will conclude this report with no action taken.
-
I already told you that in everything that I have received, there is no rule that is broken. So, my statement remains the same. I will need more evidence of this situation, or this report will be closed without further action. @Haze674
I don't need any reactions from anyone else unless you are asked to do so. @RolandsCA
- 1
-
@Haze674 I will close this report if no evidence is posted in the next 24 hours.
-
Handling due to the fact that I took the IG report. I will still need proof of everything that happened in-game.
Logs/... everything you have. Even /b. Right now, I don't have anything that indicates that this was PG'ed. The reported player is informed.
-
-
-
-
He is banned, make a refund request if you lost anything.
-
**This page would be refreshed**
-
-
The scene of the recovery of the blood splatter and the events that followed up itself are voided by management and Nervous, see the following report:
This court case as a whole is voided.
-
The scene of the recovery of the blood splatter and the events that followed up itself are voided by management and Nervous, see the following report:
This court case as a whole is voided.
- 1
-
To conclude this, player(s) have been banned that did this unapproved breakin, refund request will be handled.
- 2
-
-
Update soon. One player is already banned.
Unapproved breakin.
Send all evidence that you have already to me please.
- 3
-
Hey, sorry for this late response because I lost track of this report, along with the fact that this is and will be an important conclusion for both factions going forward. I asked around for other opinions from other admins, which also somewhat delayed the conclusion.
I will go over every accusation or assumption made in this report and explain the reason behind the ruling.
Accusation 1: It's very clear that there is still an active conflict in matters of 'turf', bad terms and faction conflict as a whole.
Keeping all those aspects in mind, along with all of the attack and defense logs that I saw from both factions, I don't see how this is considered deathmatching.
I also want to add that it doesn't matter if you are a member, prospect, president or any other rank you have in the faction. Once you are involved in a faction, you need to consider the possible consequences, no matter if your character only participates in legal activities.
Although, chasing members when a 'block-wipe' happens is punishable under the RoE rules. With the evidence that is provided, it's clear that 'the big chunk of the people' were already killed when Patrick and Lautora chased down Jason Brack.
Patrick Mack and Lautaro Arrabal will receive an ajail for [DM] Excessively chasing people while participating in a blockwipe.On 2/8/2022 at 12:45 AM, honey. said:You cannot excessively chase down people after shoot-outs. Once you partake in a BLOCKWIPE, and for the most part you've managed to take out a big chunk of the people that were at the opposition's turf, you're not allowed to chase after the remnants who are trying to flee the scene, clearly un-armed or armed (as long as they're not shooting back).
Accusation 2: VDM
VDM is a case-by-case report, and without footage, it is hard to say whether it was justified or not. Due to the lack of evidence, I will not give punishments related to this accusation. VDM'ing should be the last resort, no matter what.After speaking with multiple IFM members and other administrators to get a bit more knowledge about MC politics, I will conclude the following:
Due to the history between both MC's (wars, brawls, including lethal weapons, etc.), along with the fact that no terms are set between the MC's after all of the previous occasions, I will not void anything; it's clear that matters should be solved IC between both leaderships, or this will always stay a 'cold war' with the terms of the RoE.
I am sure that if there are any other questions related to this report, you can ask them to IFM.
-
Handling.
- 2
-
Name: Taxpayer666
Comment: If this is what the reinstatement of the death penalty is all about, so be it. Didnt know that G6 was going to get the authority to execute them. Crazy!
Los Santos Police Department
in Government & LEO
Posted