Jump to content

TBA

Charity 2021 Superstar
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About TBA

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Poland
  • Occupation
    Corp

Character Information

  • Character Name
    Carlos Carvalho
  • Faction
    LSPD

Recent Profile Visitors

2,646 profile views

TBA's Achievements

31

Reputation

  1. Great idea, +1. If you don't want to lose a car, don't drive like on GTA:O.
  2. Sounds like a good feature, but should be toggable.
  3. It's not about ignoring the call. Some people are hesitant with responding to certain incidents when it's widely known that there's nothing that can be done because of game engine/LFM limitations. If a LEO player got 1 hour to enjoy the game he's going to do something more interesting that another corpse in the middle of the street, civilian dispute between two unrealistically immature "adults" or another perfect crime with zero evidence for investigators. No LEO player is forced to respond to a 911 call, and it should stay like that.
  4. TBA

    FLD is broken.

    What? This question makes no sense. It doesn't work like that. Not only in FLD, but pretty much in any ticket-related work environment. Yes, there are obviously KPIs in real-life, and it does matter how quickly a ticket is going to be solved by an employee, but FLD is not a work. It's voluntary for PD people who want to help out with licensing. Yes - they volunteered to help with FLD process, no one forced them into this, but it doesn't mean that they're obliged to rush through applications. It can take days and I think it's totally okay.
  5. Well, it's simply impossible to respond to every call. Not only that, but it's also 100% better to do fewer calls than speed-running every call, so you can rush for another one. I'd rather provide good role-play and longer interaction than rushing into another shot-fired call.
  6. Should be renamed to "whats the point of writing player reports" since it's just waste of time seeing how staff deals with them nowadays. Punishment will be literally shorter than the amount of reporting party's time dedicated to compose a report.
  7. While I agree that the good cause requirement is requiring a bit more effort and the applicant's time, I don't know how it's "blocking" anyone. CCWs are being handed out to people on a daily basis, and there are a lot of characters holding CCW today. These characters' lives could be in danger for many different reasons and they were able to adequately explain this in the application. Good Cause requirement is not blocking, it's restricting, which was a good solution to CCW misuse. Adding this requirement solved a major problem. The problem wasn't just about "a few people". It was a large number of characters who were using CCW unrealistically and without a legit purpose. It's kinda funny that you're claiming that the "admin team hates legal rpers", because of this rule addition. It's still better to have this requirement than seeing tons of people misusing guns - or carrying those without a real purpose really.
  8. Contact number for viewing?
×
×
  • Create New...