-
Posts
151 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About TBA
- Currently Viewing Forums Index
- Birthday April 15
Personal Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Poland
-
Occupation
Corp
Character Information
-
Character Name
Carlos Carvalho
-
Faction
LSPD
Recent Profile Visitors
2,646 profile views
TBA's Achievements
31
Reputation
-
Great idea, +1. If you don't want to lose a car, don't drive like on GTA:O.
-
Show current temperature on the game overlay
TBA replied to Flashforme's topic in Implemented Suggestions
Sounds like a good feature, but should be toggable. -
TBA changed their profile photo
-
It's not about ignoring the call. Some people are hesitant with responding to certain incidents when it's widely known that there's nothing that can be done because of game engine/LFM limitations. If a LEO player got 1 hour to enjoy the game he's going to do something more interesting that another corpse in the middle of the street, civilian dispute between two unrealistically immature "adults" or another perfect crime with zero evidence for investigators. No LEO player is forced to respond to a 911 call, and it should stay like that.
-
What? This question makes no sense. It doesn't work like that. Not only in FLD, but pretty much in any ticket-related work environment. Yes, there are obviously KPIs in real-life, and it does matter how quickly a ticket is going to be solved by an employee, but FLD is not a work. It's voluntary for PD people who want to help out with licensing. Yes - they volunteered to help with FLD process, no one forced them into this, but it doesn't mean that they're obliged to rush through applications. It can take days and I think it's totally okay.
-
-
Should be renamed to "whats the point of writing player reports" since it's just waste of time seeing how staff deals with them nowadays. Punishment will be literally shorter than the amount of reporting party's time dedicated to compose a report.
-
While I agree that the good cause requirement is requiring a bit more effort and the applicant's time, I don't know how it's "blocking" anyone. CCWs are being handed out to people on a daily basis, and there are a lot of characters holding CCW today. These characters' lives could be in danger for many different reasons and they were able to adequately explain this in the application. Good Cause requirement is not blocking, it's restricting, which was a good solution to CCW misuse. Adding this requirement solved a major problem. The problem wasn't just about "a few people". It was a large number of characters who were using CCW unrealistically and without a legit purpose. It's kinda funny that you're claiming that the "admin team hates legal rpers", because of this rule addition. It's still better to have this requirement than seeing tons of people misusing guns - or carrying those without a real purpose really.
-
Contact number for viewing?