Jump to content

Wasloos

Platinum Donator
  • Posts

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Wasloos

  1. 6 hours ago, Astralsomnia said:

    If you make too many posts in Suggestions, you'll get harassed, bullied, threatened, then doxxed.

     

    If you wear cat ears and listen to bongocats (channel 155), you'll get harassed, bullied, threatened, then doxxed.

     

    If you associate with anyone certain factions don't like, you'll be blacklisted, harassed, bullied, threatened, then doxxed.

    If you play an immature character and act immaturely, you'll get labeled a troll, no matter how seriously you play them the rest of the time. Then you'll get harassed, bullied, threatened, then doxxed.

     

    The majority of players don't follow the majority of rules, but will happily closely watch and report you for every little obscure rulebreak if you piss them off.

     

    If you make a report, there's an 80% chance you'll get in trouble too for some obscure or over-complicated rule that no one actually follows 100% of the time.

     

    You can get cleared by 99 admins for something, but get penalized by that 100th admin who interprets the rules differently. Staff appeal will be tossed.

     

    You'll get reported for not RPing an unrealistic glitch in physics that launches you really high in the air. Then, you'll get RPQM'd for RPing out single injury because its "unrealistic someone would get hurt this often."

     

    If you post a video of gameplay anywhere, you're just giving haters ammo to report you with, even if you were alone.

     

    The only way to enjoy this game is to find a small group of friends, because everyone else is just really angry you don't play the way they do, and will harass, bully, threaten, then dox you.

     

    Remember guys! 90% of the community is really friendly!

    Before anyone starts shitting on her again, she's got a point yknow. Only thing I disagree with is the last statement, it's far less than 90%

    • Upvote 2
  2. 22 minutes ago, ChucoCrazy said:

     In the second clip you can see me pointing a gun at a group of people why would I do that Infront of police?!

     

    1 minute ago, ChucoCrazy said:

    3. I was pointing my middle finger at them; I don't know why It showed me aiming my gun.

    Something doesn't add up here

  3. Check the second clip at 01:04. Anwar is talking to you about the cop car behind you. Not only that. You fled away from me at like 100mph when I tried to pull you over, as well as driving absolutely erratic while you did.

     

    EDIT: I also asked you in /b what you're doing, but you didn't respond.

  4. Date and Time of incident: 22/01/24  - 23:08

    Names of witnesses (if applicable): @goddessoflife

    Your ingame name: James Matteucci

    Overall Explanation (250 word limit) : Guy did some weird driving and evaded when I wanted to pull him over. Ended up completely ignoring me and de/respawning his car mid pursuit, as well as despawning his car and disconnecting after hitting a pole.

     

     

    Accusation 1 (50 words): Guy respawned his car multiple times during pursuit and disconnected after hitting a pole.

    Reported Player(s) Who Broke it: Valentino Jimenez

    Reported Players(s) Faction (if any): N/A

    Evidence: https://medal.tv/games/gta-v/clips/1QUfIYt7gwyYVF/d1337tKavmhn?invite=cr-MSxIVFMsMjEyMTgyMzIzLA and https://medal.tv/games/gta-v/clips/1QUiucE1ToObU_/d1337ZMfBiU4?invite=cr-MSxtMFYsMjEyMTgyMzIzLA

  5. I don't see why people are going for personal attacks on someone who actively spends a lot of time on thinking through the negative sides of things, that may get abused, like the /fixveh command. Y'all just don't want the inconvenience of actually roleplaying.

    • Upvote 2
  6. Man, I remember when RP wasn't 90% of OOC fuckery. 
     

    People seem to forget that in LSRP, your cars actually took damage that you had to repair, you had to properly park your vehicles and couldn't just teleport them to you at a moments notice. Now everyone is just way too lazy to drive their cars back to their apartments or watch where they drive. People damage their cars and just /vp and /vg, pretending nothing happened. 
     

    all the same applies to /fixveh. Just ruins a lot of proper RP. 

    • Upvote 4
  7. Date and Time of incident: 19/AUG/2023 - 22:45

    Names of witnesses (if applicable): Todd Hawkins, Brandon Pitt

    Your ingame name: Randal Myles

    Overall Explanation (250 word limit) : So, we responded to a call about a potential arsonist, guy had 30 criminal points, we search him, find ecstasy and also that he has four overdue citations. We take him in so SanFire have time to investigate the arson too, want to charge him at Davis Station, guy rants over /b that we arrest him over stupid charges and disconnects.

     

     

    Accusation 1 (50 words): 1 - Common Courtesy: He just DC'd because he was angry and didn't wanna get arrested.

    Reported Player(s) Who Broke it: Darell Holt

    Evidence: uAGSgXd.png

    • Thanks 1
  8. As a member of SD who is actually in charge of the northern half of LS, please don't add any more crime zones... I don't want to think about whether to report something, because it's against server rules every single time I witness a crime in a "well populated area".

     

    Just get some more IC measures. Get G6, get property alarms, get vehicle alarms. Y'all are rich, so present yourself that way.

    • Upvote 1
  9. I've stated everything I've wanted to state. The summary of that:

     

    • The /do which states that Rafael would be identified was made due to him being clearly visible in the dashcam, wearing sunglasses, as well as the vehicle being registered in his name. Thus after checking up on his MDC file, he would've been promptly identified. I've ever stated that the other two individuals would NOT have been identified right away, due to one of them not even getting out and the other not having any available info on him anywhere.
    • The dashcam/windshield would not have been damaged enough to justify that the footage would be unusable. The windshield was hit twice in the top right, thus not damaging it in the middle at all and not compromising the footage.
    • The sunglasses would not have been nearly enough to hide your identify, especially if you consider that the vehicle used in the murder was registered to your name.
    • Your kill reason was also pretty lackluster and is the perfect example of deathmatching according to the rules, since you had NO indisputable evidence that the stop will lead to life or serious extended imprisonment.
    • Your character was arrested 6 days prior to this shooting, so saying he "matured significantly since his last arrest" is not really an argument that you can use.
    • I do, however, want to apologize for the footage accusations, as I've noticed the problematic with streamable and the footage being deleted after two days, if you don't have an account.
  10. 1 hour ago, Fox C. said:

     

     

    Since my last arrest, my character had matured in age, gotten new tattoos, face and neck tattoos that would most definitely change my characters appearance. You guys should've investigated a lot more then just one /do that involves nothing but my characters name. My character is 17. His facial features and looks will continue to change, as he's realistically going trough puberty and is continuing to grow and change. The sunglasses definitely help with masking my characters identity slightly.

     

    Just cause my character had gotten arrested once or twice before doesn't make him "a known gang banger" - Rafael literally /just/ got his put-on less then a week ago, how would he have been a known gang banger, when he had barely joined the set in a legitimate way? Along with the fact that identifying both myself and Derrick would've been 100 times harder due to the fact that the dash camera had been shot out the second Derrick got out of the car and shot - Realistically, the camera would've only captured Derrick step out, the windshield got shot up before Rafael even stepped out. ( great example here - https://streamable.com/xrt0k8 )


    The information you had provided in your /do was not "misremembered" - That's not a thing, when you have the possibility to ask us in /pm's for more information that you'd realistically have ICly. But instead, since you knew my characters name, you decided to jump over that task, and just drop it without bothering to even write up anything detailed about the shooting. Just because your "higher up's" said that its okay to do so, doesnt make it any better, it's still a rule break. All rules and regulations on the server apply to everyone, you as SD are not exempted from disregarding a rule just cause your higher ups told you to do so. 

     

    This whole warrant was roleplayed horribly from SD's side as a whole. My name was metagamed in the dash camera without any investigating. Once I got arrested, all OSS deputies that were supposed to find me for questioning etc had disconnected without warning and left a different Deputy Sheriff book me for life. Do not say that this "could have been really good rp for both parties" - As there was no effort put in to roleplay anything from the beginning, and when I say no effort, I'm talking about the fact that there was nothing investigated, Randal wasn't even declared deceased in any documentation put up for the case. If this would've been done by someone from the illegal slide of roleplay, this would've never flew and it would've been handled instantly - Just because you're from the legal side of rp, doesnt make you exempt from the server rules.

     

     

    Your last arrest before this shooting was on the 19th of July... That was 6 days before this shooting. My man, you telling me that within those 6 days you aged your character up a few years, almost making him unrecognizable to your prior mugshot? Yeah, no, I don't think so.

     

    You being a "known gangbanger" is caused by you having a file on SanGang, one that was literally listed on the court case, so you are literally proven to be a gangbanger.

     

    And about the windshield. It was shot up in the top right corner. Twice. While I do appreciate your research paper on the topic of shot up windshields, here's a few more examples of shot up windshields.

    Spoiler

    ghows-LK-4d5787a8-97f1-4e87-91d1-025d3a165a2f-aa18f423.jpeg?width=1200&disable=upscale&format=pjpg&auto=webp

    cleveland_police_shooting.0.0.jpg

    10546908_042521-ktrk-golden-forest-drive-by-shooting-haldeman-vid.jpg?w=1600

    So, as you can see in the examples, shooting a windshield twice? Wouldn't have affected the footage as much as you make it out to be, especially if you hit it, where y'all actually hit it:hGHJUyc.png

     

    And yes, I did misremember. I asked your buddy with the rifle over pm's what y'all wore, what car you drove, what the plate was and so on. I skipped over the part of who had which gun, which I probably shouldn't have, but seeing as it was a mistake on my part, that this part was already voided on the court case and that the warrant wouldn't have cared anyways, since y'all just killed a deputy, I don't think that one mistake makes such a huge difference.

     

    Also, like I said, you're in SD yourself, you're were recruited in the same batch as me and were still a trainee alongside me on the day of the shooting, so I don't see why your hostility is so rampant on this report, since you know that this is how we do things and that me asking the other deputies on that scene was very much warranted, since that was my first time being killed?

     

    So, all in all, your face was very much known to us, I got told that since your face is both on the MDC and SanGang files, that I should just drop your name, since we would've recognized you. Regardless of that, the car y'all killed me in is registered in your name, so even if we wouldn't have recognized you "because of your rapid aging and blacked out sunglasses, face tattoos and so on", the car was still in your name and the plates were very obviously on the dashcam footage.

     

    Now, I'd appreciate it if we'd let the admin do his work and see what's what, before we keep up our constant stream of repeats.

  11. 47 minutes ago, Fox C. said:

     

     

    The fact that I had my mugshot on the MTD is not an excuse to metagame my name in /pm's as your dash camera. You should've put in the effort to investigate further and take the some time to question my friend in /pm's more about what could've been seen on the dash camera, all you asked my friend was who was the other shooter. Which he responded with my name. My character's eyes were covered by blacked out sunglasses, and from a pixelated dash camera, along with the fact that the windsheild was shot up, it would've been extremely hard to identify both myself and Derrick.

    You're at fault for lying in your dash camera information and almost getting Jacob in huge amounts of trouble, it does not matter if you were "unsure" of what you could've remembered. It clearly shows that you guys did not put in enough effort to investigate and actually get the right information, rather just dropped my name in /pm's and put up a warrant for my arrest.

     

     image.png

    Like we said earlier, the sunglasses wouldn’t have done you much good in that situation anyways, nor is the dashcam that pixelated, nor would the shot up windshield (which btw had more than enough footage with you getting out before it was shot) do you enough good to not recognise you, a known gang member. Regardless of that, you’re also the registered owner of the vehicle, so that helped our investigation immensely as well, giving us the rest of our probable cause in the warrant. 
     

    Telling me that I lied in my dashcam is a tad bit over exaggerated as well, since, like I said, I had to go from memory and from the information given to me over pms by the other shooter. I simply misremembered and thus wanted the actual footage to be used in the courtcase, rather than my foggy /dos. Regardless of that, the only thing it changed anyways was who used the rifle and who didn’t. In a case of capital murder, that barely matters anyways, so it’s not that big of a deal, especially now since my /dos were voided regardless after the actual footage was brought up in the court case. 
     

    Like I mentioned earlier, I asked 4 other deputies how I should go about on describing y’all and I got told to check the MDC and just drop your names if y’all got a mugshot in there. You, as a fellow member of SD and part of my batch, should know that at the time of the shooting, I was still a trainee and using the information provided by me. So, if I get told by 4-5 senior deputies that I should do it like that? Then I’ll do it like that. 
     

     

  12. 4 hours ago, Fox C. said:

     

    Alright, you are saying that you are allowed to use /do's as dashcam footage for whatever reason you may have. Would you care to explain why your dashcam footage says "The shooter was Rafael Carballar" ? I dont see any kind of roleplay behind it and its extremely unfair, lets not go with the "I was a known gangbanger in TGS" as Im not, 90% of SD didint know who I was until the warrants had come out. At that point in time, neither Jacob or Randal ever arrest Rafael in the past, in order for him to be identified, the MTD mugshot that was on at that time was from months ago, in which Rafael's appearance would've changed a lot.

    It does not matter if you didint remember what had happened or not, for you to completely metagame in those /do's and this; definitely does not cut it. And I hope the handling admin can see what is wrong with this.

    ca5987aaa5d7a95d704339a6f38ff7d5.png

     

    You metagaming this information determined the whole case against Rafael Carballar, otherwise it would've been a whole different outcome, and my character would've very well still been out of jail without any law enforcement chasing him down.

    Rule 3 clearly states that using /do to describe a character is not to be used, as its considered metagaming, and it encourages a breach of the metagaming rule. And I doubt that it is allowed to be used within SD at all.

     

    image.png

     

    -

     

    Yourself and Jacob were desperately trying to force us to not roleplay those dashcam and warrant statements out, as you both knew it was gonna get you guys in a lot of trouble ICly. You knew clearly who had the AR and who didint, its impossible to miss that, its not a small detail that you accidentally get wrong. You lied and metagamed in your dashcam footages and warrant reports, and when you got caught, you had to take an OOC turn just to get out of it, cause you both know you wouldve lost your leo characters. 

     

    Lets not say how play 2 win that is as well, pushing something to the brim just for a capital murder trial to go the way you want, even though you don't lose or win anything in return. It sucks this case had to take such an OOC turn, just because of how childish some of these SD members are, where you guys have constantly bashed our faction and oocly attacked my lawyer just cause of the fact that he was handling a TGS' member case.

     

    image.png

    image.png

     

     

    The situation that we were in is definitely not against the rules. My IC friend had killed a different cop a couple days ago, and he was realistically roleplaying the fear of getting caught, and at that time he was armed heavily and in his eyes, shooting you was the best getaway chance he had at that time. It's not something we just came up with just to shoot you.

     

     

    That clip was not deleted by me, and I will not take the blame for that. If you arent aware, streamable deletes the clips you have posted after a certain amount of time.

     

    That is all from me, I wont respond or post anymore, unless an admin asks me to do so.

    The /do on the dashcam was a little more than what was shown in the case. I explained step by step how it came to the traffic stop, that two guys hopped put and shot me. That’s where I mixed up who had what, since at the time y’all shot me, I was, to everyones surprise, trying not to die. So, I obviously couldn’t 100% remember who had what weapon. The only reason I even assumed you had a rifle, was cause of my damages, which stated rifle shots, and the fact that the other guy who hopped out with you, who I PM’d afterwards for information on what the dashcam had seen, stated that there was a rifle involved. I ultimately assumed it came from you, since I didn’t see a whole lot in that situation. Now, since drw already stated that your mugshot was rather new and that you’ve been known to our unit, I don’t think I have to explain why I identified you straight in that /do. The only reason the other guy wasn’t, was because he didn’t have any MDC mugshot up. If the /do wouldn’t have been allowed, then someone of that 4 deputy crowd would’ve told me so, since I was still in my trainee phase at the time. 
     

    I wouldn’t have lost jack shit on those statements, because as you may know, I kinda died, so that dashcam footage ain’t mine technically. However, I just cleared up that I made a mistake in the /do and wanted y’all to rp the proper dashcam, the one that you could’ve provided as well. The one that you deleted the second it came in handy for you.

     

    Got nothing more to add, so we can go ahead and wrap this up if le admin doesn’t have any more questions 

  13. Randal Myles here. 
     

    Lemme go dissect this accusation by accusation. 
     

    Metagaming: So, I don’t have any recording device going on my PC, since it fucks with my textures, meaning I gotta /do my dashcams, instead of actually showing off a recording. That technique itself is very much allowed in SD and I even asked beforehand, since I was fresh out of academy when the shooting happened. I got my information from my memory and your buddy with the rifle in pms, since my dashcam would obviously catch the entire shooting. Here’s a link to it just in case, from your very own video too https://streamable.com/bfdxhk. The fact that I mentioned you by name, was because I asked the fellow deputies, which were also detectives, how I would go on and describe y’all through /do. I got told, if any of you got their mugshots taken on the MDC, then I am very much okay to tell them that you’d be identified, so I went on and did that. The sunglasses are really not an excuse to say you wouldn’t have been identified, since Rafael is a known gangbanger in TGS. 

    Powergaming: I wasn’t trying to void the dashcam, I was simply saying that the deputies statements about the mix up of rifle and handgun were caused by me misremembering the situation, since didn’t have any footage of it back then. Now since this https://streamable.com/bfdxhk would be the dashcam, it would have been very much clear that the driver, you, had the pistol and the passenger had the rifle. It was a simple OOC mistake by me, caused by lack of information. Also, I wasn’t trying to RP a different perspective or a different dashcam footage, I wanted y’all to RP the proper dashcam footage, and not my /dos, which I misremembered. 

     

    Now, I want to also remind y’all that hopping out of the car and shooting a cop just because you think they got a warrant on you is also very much against the rules, as mentioned in

    4) Deathmatching

    A character may only murder a member of law enforcement when there is an active existing threat to life, or there is indisputable evidence that the stop will lead to life or serious extended imprisonment.

     

    Oh and one might also be a little suspicious that you removed your own recording of the shooting on both the court case AND this report. Not sure how well that fits into the common courtesy of this server, honestly. 

×
×
  • Create New...