Piepstem

this goes hard, keep it up lane, i c u

still going strong

nicee!!

very strong dialectical analysis, comrade

Totally supporting this, +1. Will make the role-play more efficient.

Neo-communist Liberal? That's an oxymoron. The man on my profile picture is Zhou Enlai. Extremely ironic how Pol Pot was supported by the west, but I digress.

There certainly are sources that back up my argument. I just don't drop them here because this is not what this thread is about. I'm merely replying to you at this point to defend myself, seeing that you are clueless enough to throw words around you don't understand yourself. Like I said, my DMs are always open.

Pretty sure that you are the debate bro here, derailing the topic and bomb dropping sources. I am not gonna do the same but if you want to discuss these things you can always DM me. As of now, you can always stay on-topic.

In other words: ''there's nothing wrong with racism''.

That is not the moon man he is referring to, buddy. Stop trying to be an apologist.

My profile picture is a democratically elected Chinese Prime Minister, that is not the same as young Hitler at all. The fact that you are making an appeal to authority and using weasel words / anonymous authority when you refer to these ''thousands of historians'' makes your argument even worse.

Yes..? It has already been established that in this context, we are speaking about the hate symbol. The person never denied it either, he just said he is ''brown and so couldn't be racist'' for having a pfp like that.

You clearly don't know the racist implications behind it. Read the topic replies before you reply yourself.

It certainly is a case-by-case which creates gray-zones and issues. But what you are using to strengthen your argument with is a very specific example, there have been people that used extreme racist monikers or even used racist symbols such as the SS runes.

It certainly is a western-centric view and that you mention ''the facts of history'' reaffirms this. Again, I am not interested in holding a debate with people that strive to avert the topic from the issue at hand that has been mentioned in the main thread and has been mentioned over and over again in the thread itself by other members of this community.