Rauf

no. ame use is restricted anyways. not needed.

accepted under gps overhaul

ok

To be fair to you and your well received claims of people losing trust in the admin team- here's the thing. I'm not LFM so I don't know what went behind the curtains, but I had to make my report to LFM twice against roozles and PD (when I was in it, that too after I was warned to not to). Nervous is right- people kept reporting roozles for 3 months- how do I know that? Because whenever I'd talk to some person on discord about PD they'd have nothing nice to say about the leadership and they kept on emphasizing how LFM wouldn't listen to them. So, I think everyone knows it wasn't an 'admin' or solely a 'LFM' decision at the end- it was a result of numerous reports that people made against the leadership. To paint it as anything other than that- honestly, just looks like an attempt to undermine the admin team and propogate the false narrative provided in this topic by the self-proclaimed martyr.

think that's only the first page!

Was that 'reassignment' not a demotion?

Absolute joke. I will try to say this in the most respectful way I can. The amount of people that left PD for SD during your 'leadership' (or tried to) was a lot. it's nice that you have your friends vouching for you in this thread (all of them posting appreciations and all) but that was not at all the reality. You got reported a lot of times for being biased and though, I left PD shortly after you, cannot say anything in regards to that. The previous PD leader didn't have such problems, I can say that connor won't so maybe the faction and the people weren't the problem. You talk about bringing 'realism'- well that can be debated again and again. I'm not sure if you remember me or our encounter and I hope you don't. I received an OOC faction warning from PD and I wanted to contest it with the LFM. Why? Because it was OOC and it was wrong- and I remember mentioning it and you instantly hopping in my TS channel, telling me off about how there will be a lot of 'problems' and I would be in the middle of it. Obviously, it doesn't sound too bad right now- but your tone at that time clearly showed that your OOC ego jumped due to your IC position- and frankly- that is where problems arise. After which, I transferred to SD (the greatest decision ever by the way) and all I heard after was how bad a 'Chief' you and your the friends who you rewarded were. This will be the first and last reply I will make on this topic- but I believe it's 100% important for clear transparency where you have your friends posting replies on the topics- vouching for you. 🙂

this will be auto handled when we have a new inventory system

Whereas this is a completely IC situation; here is my opinion about the topic: It's harsh, well harsh and represents a bit of robotic roleplay but then again to each their own and generally it's bad to comment or judge someone's RP. But since LEO RP impacts the whole playerbase, maybe LEO RP'ers should be encouraged and pushed more to have a rather more realistic approach? again, just my opinion

accepted

its cuz rage needs to fix some issues on its end. u need alot of persistent restarts to connect to a server on 1.1 and there is the FPS drop issue (that I face). and its reported by others too and the number of players with such issues is expected to grow. I believe this is also why no big voice roleplay server (e.g mafia city, eclipse) have moved to 1.1 themselves yet too. dw gtaw is ready for 1.1 and will deploy when issues on rage's end are fixed : )

yes plz

235

232

u forgot that we kicked @Maple

throwaway characters when

It's literally their own choice to name it as they want. As long as it's of the expected caliber... not sure how that would be forcing. Whereas I like the suggestion; the implementation can be rather tacky. If left to the players to name their own guns, it will surely get trolled and abused. Maybe you can make the setting of a weapon name possible once only.

m staff member

ok

no-..

Locking this for now. This suggestion serves little purpose, has little foresight and is just not up there.

I'd like to say bluntly but rather firmly that it is a suggestion I don't see being implemented. You want to be given temporary access to change plates because they're in your dealership so you don't have to insure them? This is absurd and frankly- doesn't make sense at all. If your car doesn't have insurance paid or w/e - then it is simply not road legal (from an IC perspective). It is too much to add for too little. Dealerships already make a lot. You can insure it for the bare minimum or charge your customer when you sell. Don't see the need to have this at all.

Okay-..

could do with stringent OOC checks on players history to make sure they wont abuse it