I'm sure that RPQM is more than happy to talk to anyone in the community about how their processes work. However, you want transparency about how individual reports are handled and who submits them.
Petty reports can be discarded by RPQM administrators with or without transparency, so that doesn't really add anything substantial, other than dissuading people from making reports in the first place. I don't think we want to go that route because the roleplay quality of the average player is so bad already, we really don't need people to be discouraged further from reports about quality. Poor quality needs to be addressed, or we can all just go play GTA:O.
Next is the actual handling of RPQM reports between administrator and player. Why do they need to be public? Are you having doubts that RPQM administrators are acting unfairly or unevenly? Is there even any indication of this? What is this extra transparency going to be adding in value to the community? Transparency for the sake of transparency sounds nice, but not if it comes at the cost of the effectiveness of the process. So there must be additional value to be gained from this. What exactly is this value that you're pursuing?