Jump to content

SCANDALOUZ

Gold Donator
  • Posts

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SCANDALOUZ

  1. TLDR on the state of /attributes: (Admins should be more actively punishing that imo) It's Powergame if you don't ERP My character. Why? Im just sexy, im alluring, im just perfect, You cannot deny that your character doesnt find my Character sexy, beautiful and just fucking beautiful. Like im just so fucking hot and sexy and silky and Perfect. You cannot Resist my allure, Im Tantalizing, so ravenous just fierce and passioniate of the fires. So you don't want to Erotic Roleplay Me because I'm a Male in real life? Lol, Talk about Powergame? Talk about Self Insert? You are such a loser if you DOnt Erotic Roleplay My Character, Honestly, I'm a female character. You're a male character. Duh, you want to Have erp with my character? Who cares because Im a male OOC? What does that change? What is that fair? Why are you trying to Cross the briges of Love between eachother
  2. I want social businesses (like bars) that don't require /bad (pay to win) to actually sustain themselves and have consistent visitations. 🙂
  3. The comparison isn't a fair one given the two different platforms and that the two have hit their peaks (assuming GTAW did) in different "eras". GTAW obviously has the better platform and script, LSRP on its best day however had the better role players/quality overall. This isn't the fault of GTAW or its staff/ownership. It's merely a matter of the community. Most of old school role players that grew up with pen and paper and DND are now grown up and done. This you can say for the most part is a rather new generation. LSRP didn't have pay to win features, GTAW does (BUSINESS BLIP). GTAW however enjoys more active development and you can get cool stuff quicker.
  4. TTCF needs to be its own faction at this point. The SD lacks the manpower to properly maintain it.
  5. 1) It's not fine. 2) The rest of your thoughts/suggestions are fine and idealistic, but it's highly unlikely that they will become a reality any time soon. The server really isn't that big on enforcing all these "high standards" that it claims to uphold. 3) The only good thing about the whole situation is that players try and combat this themselves. As in, the big/good, official and illegal factions not putting up with such member base (e.g. no off-the-boat immigrants in a lcn concept).
  6. The point that you should get from this is that the administration team is royally inconsistent when it comes to handling player conflicts and/or situations like these. Normally, you' run into these three admin types: 1) No nonsense and very strict on quality, ajails flying left and right 2) You guys did this and this wrong, let's just void this, be friends and try and be better in the future 3) Person X (even tho Person X, for the sake of argument is an obvious, loop-hole exploiting horribad) didn't break this exact line in the server rules, therefore I can't do much And anything in-between... And yes, this is a problem.
  7. Nah it's bad. It's biased, oocly passive aggressive and showcasing thought as if ppl could mind read.
  8. I don't know if you're Bae, but this is a textbook example of a bad role player who thinks they are good. How/Why? 1) Long and pretentious emotes. 2) Emoting out thoughts and feelings as if people can mind read, just so they can better push their own narrative on the situation. Insulting other characters in emotes, etc. People are literally not mind readers, stop telling them how stupid they are in emotes, it makes you look stupid. Shit like this is you just being borderline (not really borderline) a passive aggressive fellow who brings OOC into IC.
  9. Depends. Want to portray your character smoking? Just /me lights up a cigarette. Want to showcase the Zippo that saved your character's life in Vietnam? /me dug into his pocket for a pack of Marlboro Reds and a Zippo lighter. He bit a cigarette and started the lighter up with a finger-snapping trick. Detailed emotes are a good storytelling tool, but when it's just some meaningless-in-the-bigger-picture action, you should keep it simple. IMO, and I'll fight anyone who disagrees IRL. EDIT: PSA: Stop emoting out thoughts and feelings. Please don't ask why not.
  10. Aging a character (visually) is already possible via /surgery (face creation). Pretty sure there's a literal AGING slider, and you can generally play around with the rest to make an older face. Combine that with grey hair or whatever and there you have it. Being able to (visually) edit height and weight would be amazing, but it will probably be a huge amount of work. Nobody has mentioned the real character customisation MVP yet though. Cup size. When? Little Seoul will be on fire. Also, you're just a random penguin. Why the hell should we listen to you at all?
  11. Hey, This will be short. I want to share with you all a very nice website that speaks about all things GTA-5 cars in great depth. Did you know that neons and exhaust tips significantly affect your car's centre of mass and subsequently it's handling/on-road (indirectly) performance? You do now. Such a resource will probably come as a "thank you, captain obvious" to many, but I'm sure a good bit of people will appreciate it. The website offers, like already suggested, in-depth explanations when it comes to vehicle modifications and how they truly can affect a vehicle. It contains spreadsheets with real-top speeds and literally everything. I take absolutely ZERO credit for this. Just sharing the love. Now and without further to do: https://broughy.com/gta5carupgrades Picture for effect
  12. 17 pages in and I've only seen 1-2 users formulate an actual counter-argument on as to why we shouldn't at the very least exempt illegal characters from denying offensive-rp FTB (so denying the consequences of such rp, e.g. dismemberment). The rest are either: - Support - Just no (not much of a case) - I feel, but I'unno - YA'LL ARE JUST PREDATORS WOW - Here for the shitposting Interesting.
  13. This is hella funny. 1) The superb SUV and how broke they are. 2) The fact the LEOs actually loaded on time and he didn't just drive thru' nothing. 3) One of the cops just got up and kept walking at the very end.
  14. 1) We don't need to add a boatload of weapons, just the good ones. 2) Most MOD stuff is imbalanced/op as shit at times (such as cars), so be wary. 3) We definitely need ammo diversity.
  15. 5char As for rape, I still find it a reasonable, albeit unpleasant analogy. And... Scandalous content is often a good way to bring more attention to a subject.
  16. I edited the post at the time of your reply, mb, but peep the lines suggested. I don't think such a suggestion makes me a monster.
  17. Don't think anyone wants rape back. I know I don't. I think it's mostly used as an easy analogy. All I want is two lines added in the offensive rp rules. 1) Characters in illegal factions are exempt from refusing offensive FTB. Not emoting is fine, but you must take the consequences. 2) Introduction of torture requests similar to CK requests. So you could, with a good reason, fucking maim a character, even if just as FTB, they would still have to deal with the consequences. That in the case that said character has first denied offensive rp at all, even as ftb, but you have a darn good IC reason. Just like CKs, really.
×
×
  • Create New...