vally

In my opinion on the topic, it doesn't make sense to kill someone who calls 911 after robbing them because it's just expected. Makes more sense to PK someone whom you know or gathered info they are going to call and testify your crime to police on you but have not done so yet. Whether you're at fault for it or not, you want to clear them out of your way. That's what criminals do. Every trouble they have was started by their own choices in life, and mistakes, and every murder they do was as well.

Asking price is 250,000 dollars.

Detailed Description: I don't know if it is possible but after the new update it's probably possible to attach an image in the 3D world of the game, I'm suggesting that we could have an item as a poster where you can attach a custom image to it and have it in your place. Relevant Commands/Items A command to attach an imgur link for a poster. How will it benefit the server? Script that can give creativity both to illegal and legal players showing off pictures in their place.

🔥🔥

🔥 bring her far

/vp and /vg makes the /vdup useless, you'd have to give one away again so the first point is covered... Your second point has the same issue as breaking in the vehicle with a lockpick at the moment, so I'd leave the reasonable time of keeping a stolen car for another topic. The owner of the vehicle has more control and responsibility on whom to trust of handing a duplicate key to, rather than leaving the car outside a crowded club to then get it stolen by a random guy with a lockpick.

Thanks for seeing further into this, the risk you mentioned in the option number one is basically as much or less as the risks involved in any other criminal activity. My topic still remains as suggestion of changing the rule you mentioned to forbidding obtaining the asset of it but not the temporary use.

Currently the rule does not clearly specify whether you can scam for a duplicate of a key of the vehicle without getting the ownership of this, or only refers to the ownership of it. Although my guess of the rule is that you can steal a vehicle, not for the ownership, but for having it running for you, as whether you use a lockpick, or a /vdup scam, shouldn't change a lot. This gives confusion not only to members, also to staff members (I have been warned before for vehicle scams, for asking for a /vdup). So my suggestion is, whether it is not clearly specified, or whether it is the actual rule, to change and add that you can't scam only for the ownership of the vehicle as an asset, because it doesn't make a lot sense right now. If I ask a player to let me try their vehicle and they decide to give me the key, I shouldn't be forced by an OOC rule to return the car since I'm not taking the whole asset.

Is it possible to steal a car not by a lockpick but by asking the owner to let you try it with a duplicate of the key, so as scamming it, but not for the ownership of the car, just for the short-term roleplay with it? So, this is what the admins tell me when I ask, but I think they misunderstand my question. I've read the rule and it appears to refer to the ownership of the assets, not to what my scope is.

I think a good part of people who get punished for this rule are just kids trolling in the game who would get weirded out if they happened to see IRL from somebody what they jokingly did IG. -1