Undead
-
Posts
63 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Undead
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3 minutes ago, Briggs said:
I do want to provide some insight to the resignation of a high-ranking faction member; Cascade (Samantha McGill). It continues to appear to be a common misconception among faction members and external community members that she was forced to leave the faction; this is false. Prior to her resignation, she was spoken to at length concerning her role in the faction, her activity and her stance towards the direction of the faction (additional realism). This was thoroughly discussed with Server Management and Legal Faction Management, approved by Nervous, and the decision to offer reassignment was not an impulsive one, but instead one that was subject to weeks worth of discussions and deliberations.
She willingly chose to resign, but has always been allowed to come back, and would have been with open arms should she have chosen to reinstate. Frankly, some decisions are more controversial than others. But I wish to stress that these decisions are typically incredibly complex in nature, and a great number of factors come into play, some of which you may not be aware. Oftentimes, shedding light on these details may be inappropriate, or violate the privacy of those faction members involved (in this case, Samantha McGill). That was not something that we were willing to do.
In any case, despite our attempted transparency on the matter, inevitably, there are numerous misinformed assumptions about what happened, and that will always appear to be the case.Trust me, my source is better than yours.
-
3
-
-
9 minutes ago, lux said:
Cascade, for example - long standing community member, long standing PD high command, trusted admin - being OOCly demoted in favor of one of your friends fast-tracking the ranks because she was "too nice" as I've been told.
this.
Nobody turned on Roozles because of his decisions suddenly during his time as Chief or because he wanted more realism. It was them vs the people they forced out for their own choices from the very beginning, when those people worked and deserved those positions. I never once submitted a report as I personally witnessed nothing that would deem one, but there has been numerous instances in which I knew someone who did and they were absolutely right to do so imo.
-
1
-
[1870] Preservation of Life Act; preserving life or infringing rights?
in Official Press
Posted
Username: Sandman
Comment: Never thought it would've been made so obvious these senators have never spoken to their constituents or hell, anyone living in Los Santos about this subject before they decided they needed to control women's rights. The people of Los Santos would rather keep those rights then wanting to be Texas 2.0 and the senators who purposes this bill obviously don't care about their constituents thoughts on this bill or have never cared, which is more likely.
Other states (New Jersey) will have abortion laws that enable people to travel state to state to get their medical needs met, the fact you're trying to ban it in San Andreas only means they'll go somewhere else and possibly a different country with worse medical care. Banning anything hasn't worked for a single thing in America's entire existence, see: drugs, abortions before they were legal (whoops what a miscarriage, something will we see return as a result of this bill) and prohibition.
Anyone who supports this bill should be stripped of their position as a Senator for utter incompetency.