Jump to content

Property Request Ruling - "We do not change multi-interior interiors."


Recommended Posts

So I didn't really know what to do with this. Since the discord states not to pester Admins and I wouldn't count this as emergency.

Last night I made an Interior Request which was promptly denied, the reason given was simply what the title is: We do not change multi-interior interiors. 

 

Now I'd be fine with this if not for a few issues. I'm going to work off the assumption that Multi-Interior Interiors is to mean apartment complexes. Such as mine 'Ocean Walk - Floor X, Room X'. Taking this into account I can understand why you would want to keep all the apartments similar for thematic reasons. However I find it kind of redundant because we don't have access to all those apartment blocks. This isn't a solid building made up of 10, 20 apartments all looking the exact same that we can enter. They're each individually generated and loaded in, it wouldn't be possible to see these glaring differences, nor would it affect anyone. As well as this. There are certain buildings that are apartment / flat in nature. Such as a portion in Alta Street (I believe it's 205,206,207). That are stacked atop each other, and the only reason for having this numbering system is the doors you can enter from, which is through a stairwell at the front, however at the back of the building there is also what looks to be a main door, making it apartment style in nature. But because you decided to set it up as the main door uses the ladder way, they are now separate entities.

 

My other complaint is the prevalence of the flat I'm trying to replace. ID6. Pushing aside my personal distaste for the building. I spent a day riding around different apartments and looking around. I found ID6 in use at Ginger Street for 85k, Sunshine Apartments for 100k, my own, ocean walk for 120k, next door are a set of far higher class apartments for 140k, and directly on the opposite side of what the UCP map currently shows for sale, 135k at Powerstreet. This leads me to assume that the apartment ID, 6. Is the default for any 'Middle Class Apartment / studio'. I don't understand the huge disparity of regions for this apartment to be so commonplace. I could understand it being used in some cheaper areas. But it's cramped, wholly impossible to renovate due to how finicky it's interior manager is. (Floating lamps, porno mags stuck to a wall, coffee table deleted, remotes floating above it, side doors to cabinets just gone, leaving a poorly rendered empty cupboard) and dosen't fit with an aesthetic in a lot of areas.

 

Additional While Writing this up: I went and checked a building, the 111* Row of buildings at Palomino Avenue. This is for all intent and purpose a flat block. Would this count as 'Multi Interior Interiors?' it's an apartment block, surely it should fall under the same pretense as Ocean Walk, it's a multi-interior interior. Except I'm guessing it's classed otherwise because I can individually enter each room.  I also checked inside, this is ID 11, the one I requested the change too. This is 150k, so only 10k more expensive then a building using ID 6, and for myself would only be 5k more to purchase than the combine building cost and renovation cost (120k+25k) However, this is still counted as Middle Class.

 

As well as this. After looking through the main portions of the forum reference interior changes, which is mostly just the document to fill out, as well as the information stating the 3 Rules of changing your interior, there is No Mention what so ever of this in play. In fact the only stated forum rules are:

Quote
  • Your interior must match the exterior of your house. 

-There are 3 conditions under this rule that must be met for an interior change to be approved:

1 The size of the building must match the size of the interior. The interior can be smaller than the building, but may not be larger. 
2 The interior must match the general appearance of the building, meaning you will not be able to have a fancy, high-end interior if the property itself isn't a high-end building. 
3 The location of the property must be taken into consideration, meaning you can not have a fancy high-end interior in a low income area. 

The rule of thumb is the interior change must be realistic and appropriate for the building. 
No exceptions will be made.

 

  • You must have the cash ready + on hand at the time of interior switch.

 

  • YOUR INTERIOR MUST BE ON THE LIST, NO EXCEPTIONS WILL BE MADE.

 

  • You must actively own the property that you are requesting the change for.

No where is We do not change multi-interior interiors. Which is an issue. I followed these and applied, thinking it was fine. Anyone else making an application to change their appartment is likely to be met with the same comment and either shrug it off or just live with it. But I don't think that's fair.

 

So for a TL;DR - Why can't I change my apartment interior?

Link to comment

I bought a multi-interior apartment in a middle-class area with the assumption I'd be able to change it into one of the other middle-class interiors because the rule isn't written down anywhere in the property request section. I'd like to get an answer on this too.

Link to comment

I was really curious and since I've been literally looking all week, I decided to look at some of the more expensive apartments. They all have the same interior. It seems every single mid-high apartment has the exact same interior, and we aren't allowed to change them. Why aren't we allowed to do that?

Edited by Tplayer47
Link to comment

So I want to add some more. I've just gone through San Andreas Boulevard, Palomino Boulevard, Eclipse and Tinsel Towers with someone I decided to room mate with. These are arguably some of the most expensive apartments on the market, 200k, 240k, 300k, 325k. They're all the same apartment. In a 125k bracket, where the majority of available UCP buildings for high class homes are apartments. They are:

 

All the Same apartment style.

All 'Multi-Interior Interiors'. 

 

What I want to know is why? Why is their no deviation in the apartments and why offer the service to renovate when a huge chunk of them are illedgible for a reason that isn't publicized ANYWHERE? I dug into the refund requests and while hindsight is 20/20, a lot of the refunds are because of this bullshit. Why?

Edited by Edelweiss206
Link to comment
  • Robyn locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...