Jump to content

mj2002

Charity 2023 Tier 4 Donator
  • Posts

    5,323
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About mj2002

Rank

  • Member Title
    Legal Faction Management

Recent Profile Visitors

40,535 profile views

mj2002's Achievements

1.2k

Reputation

  1. I'll wait for the moment when the majority of forum posters that claim to represent illegal roleplay agree with you on this point.
  2. Probably because those that file the report have a genuine belief that a rule was broken? Either that, or they're trying to get something out of a report that benefits themselves.
  3. So then we don't have OOC concerns about body cameras either, right?
  4. There doesn't need to be a consensus. This isn't a democracy. These rules were set in place and Nervous has repeatedly explained that they aren't going to removed without an alternative that works for the community at large. Just because a group of people on the forums don't like them and refuse to provide a realistic alternative doesn't mean your input is now suddenly to be taken seriously. Again, all you're doing in this thread is continuously repeating your dislike for the rules in place. We already know this. You're not bringing anything new to the table. We've had these arguments dozens of times before you decided to grace us with your input in this next round of useless forum arguing. When are you going to seriously engage with this topic? Instead of just going back and forth and getting this thread locked, why don't we start now? In order for this to be resolved, there needs to be a solution to the following problem: Simply allowing vehicles to be used in robberies revives the meta where you can roll up in a group of 2+ to literally anyone walking around in the city, and through the use of the powergaming rule, instantly put anyone in a position where they either surrender their possessions or be reported for powergaming (not roleplaying fear). Now, this is the part where you come up with a solution that allows the use of vehicles, and doesn't revive this meta. No more complaining about groups of people, legal roleplayers, illegal roleplayers, mallrats, grudges, or whatever keeps being conjured up. Just address the actual issue for once.
  5. You may be overthinking this a little bit. You yourself have a reasonable suspicion that someone's roleplay quality is awful, right? Otherwise you wouldn't be considering to make a report to begin with. Whatever lead you to the conclusion that the roleplay is substandard, you can submit as evidence. Take some screenshots of whatever convinced you yourself, go to the UCP and copy some chat logs that you witnessed, record a video if you're in a position to do so, and then submit that as evidence. They're not asking you to present a foolproof case that could withstand scrutiny in a court of law. They just need to have a good reason to spend time on investigating it.
  6. I don't understand why you keep repeating the same talking points over and over again without actually engaging in a meaningful discussion. There have dozens of threads about this, and every time the answer is the same. If you want to use vehicles for robberies again, then come up with a way in which this can be achieved without creating a meta where a few dozen players can ruin the experience of roleplaying on this server for pretty much everyone else. That's what the situation was before, and pretending it didn't happen or that it wasn't so bad isn't going to change anything. All you come up with is 'This is unrealistic and it should be allowed again', and then conveniently ignoring the consequences of implementing your ideas. When you make a substantial change in the rules, you have to consider all the reasonably expected impacts that this change may have. Are you willing to do this? If so, then please demonstrate for us how this would work and what your plan is for mitigating the glaringly obvious flaws in your approach. Is that really too much to ask? Once again, do you actually want these changes or do you just want to complain about this topic?
  7. Its also a bit unrealistic. How are you supposed to be able to see who is tuned into these frequencies? Due to the design of the technology, you essentially can't know who is listening. Nevermind the metagaming problems with giving out names of characters who are connected. Through which method would that make sense?
  8. That's because you're unwilling or unable to understand the reasons why this rule is in place. This has been discussed over and over again in countless of threads. However, you (not you personally) just refuse to accept the reasons why these rules are in place. When an explanation is given to you, you ignore it. When it is explained to you what you should provide in order to resolve this situation, you dodge the discussion and just complain. Guess what? Complaining doesn't solve problems, and it doesn't get you anywhere closer to a situation where robberies involving cars are allowed again. You can keep caps locking all you like for the next 15 threads about this same topic, but until you start engaging seriously nothing is going to happen. Do you actually want a solution?
×
×
  • Create New...